Gaudrain et al., 2018 - Google Patents
Discrimination of voice pitch and vocal-tract length in cochlear implant usersGaudrain et al., 2018
View HTML- Document ID
- 1907095330226133952
- Author
- Gaudrain E
- Başkent D
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Ear and hearing
External Links
Snippet
Objectives: When listening to two competing speakers, normal-hearing (NH) listeners can take advantage of voice differences between the speakers. Users of cochlear implants (CIs) have difficulty in perceiving speech on speech. Previous literature has indicated sensitivity to …
- 239000007943 implant 0 title abstract description 73
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L25/00—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00
- G10L25/48—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use
- G10L25/51—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use for comparison or discrimination
- G10L25/66—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use for comparison or discrimination for extracting parameters related to health condition
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L17/00—Speaker identification or verification
- G10L17/26—Recognition of special voice characteristics, e.g. for use in lie detectors; Recognition of animal voices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/003—Changing voice quality, e.g. pitch or formants
- G10L21/007—Changing voice quality, e.g. pitch or formants characterised by the process used
- G10L21/013—Adapting to target pitch
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/02—Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L19/00—Speech or audio signal analysis-synthesis techniques for redundancy reduction, e.g. in vocoders; Coding or decoding of speech or audio signal, using source filter models or psychoacoustic analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B21/00—Teaching, or communicating with, the blind, deaf or mute
- G09B21/001—Teaching or communicating with blind persons
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Gaudrain et al. | Discrimination of voice pitch and vocal-tract length in cochlear implant users | |
| Whitmal et al. | Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience | |
| Cullington et al. | Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification | |
| Chatterjee et al. | Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition | |
| Başkent | Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: Phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric–acoustic stimulation | |
| Gaudrain et al. | Factors limiting vocal-tract length discrimination in cochlear implant simulations | |
| Marx et al. | Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing | |
| Stickney et al. | Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences | |
| McPherson et al. | Harmonicity aids hearing in noise | |
| Moberly et al. | Word recognition variability with cochlear implants:“perceptual attention” versus “auditory sensitivity” | |
| Francart et al. | Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests | |
| Cabbage et al. | Speech perception differences in children with dyslexia and persistent speech delay | |
| Shafiro | Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution | |
| Gilbert et al. | Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility | |
| Meister et al. | The use of voice cues for speaker gender recognition in cochlear implant recipients | |
| Clarke et al. | Pitch and spectral resolution: A systematic comparison of bottom-up cues for top-down repair of degraded speech | |
| Stuart et al. | Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners | |
| Luo et al. | Interaction between pitch and timbre perception in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users | |
| Souza et al. | Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing | |
| Skuk et al. | Parameter-specific morphing reveals contributions of timbre and fundamental frequency cues to the perception of voice gender and age in cochlear implant users | |
| Li et al. | Tone production and perception and intelligibility of produced speech in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implanted children | |
| Koelewijn et al. | The effects of lexical content, acoustic and linguistic variability, and vocoding on voice cue perception | |
| Taitelbaum-Swead et al. | Auditory and visual information in speech perception: A developmental perspective | |
| Kim et al. | Mandarin tone recognition training with cochlear implant simulation: Amplitude envelope enhancement and cue weighting | |
| Waddington et al. | Recognition of accented speech by cochlear-implant listeners: Benefit of audiovisual cues |