[go: up one dir, main page]

Michail et al., 2014 - Google Patents

Figure of image quality and information capacity in digital mammography

Michail et al., 2014

View PDF @Full View
Document ID
18001423999918367493
Author
Michail C
Kalyvas N
Valais I
Fudos I
Fountos G
Dimitropoulos N
Koulouras G
Kandris D
Samarakou M
Kandarakis I
Publication year
Publication venue
BioMed Research International

External Links

Snippet

Objectives. In this work, a simple technique to assess the image quality characteristics of the postprocessed image is developed and an easy to use figure of image quality (FIQ) is introduced. This FIQ characterizes images in terms of resolution and noise. In addition …
Continue reading at onlinelibrary.wiley.com (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10116—X-ray image
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation not covered by G01N21/00 or G01N22/00, e.g. X-rays or neutrons
    • G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation not covered by G01N21/00 or G01N22/00, e.g. X-rays or neutrons by transmitting the radiation through the material
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
    • G06T5/007—Dynamic range modification
    • G06T5/008—Local, e.g. shadow enhancement
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
    • G06T5/001—Image restoration
    • G06T5/002—Denoising; Smoothing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01T—MEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
    • G01T1/00—Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
    • G01T1/16—Measuring radiation intensity
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
    • G06T11/003—Reconstruction from projections, e.g. tomography
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/582—Calibration

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mackenzie et al. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x‐ray system
Friedman et al. A simple approach to measure computed tomography (CT) modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise‐power spectrum (NPS) using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom
Chen et al. Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods
Le et al. Least squares parameter estimation methods for material decomposition with energy discriminating detectors
Won Kim et al. Realistic simulation of reduced‐dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOM CT images
Altunbas et al. A post‐reconstruction method to correct cupping artifacts in cone beam breast computed tomography
Richard et al. Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual‐energy x‐ray images
Cockmartin et al. Comparative power law analysis of structured breast phantom and patient images in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis
Richard et al. Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual‐energy imaging
Rivetti et al. Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast‐detail analysis
Ghetti et al. Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors
Mackenzie et al. Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities
Acciavatti et al. Observation of super‐resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis
Michail et al. Figure of image quality and information capacity in digital mammography
Sechopoulos X‐ray scatter correction method for dedicated breast computed tomography
US20200187893A1 (en) Beam hardening correction in x-ray dark-field imaging
Richard et al. Quantitative imaging in breast tomosynthesis and CT: Comparison of detection and estimation task performance
Borges et al. Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation
Salvagnini et al. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics
Sanchez et al. Task‐based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics
Lu et al. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: Effects of projection‐view distributions
Zhu Local filtration based scatter correction for cone‐beam CT using primary modulation
Imai et al. Statistical characteristics of streak artifacts on CT images: relationship between streak artifacts and mA s values
Shi et al. X‐ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT using a forward‐projection model
Cruz‐Bastida et al. Impact of noise reduction schemes on quantitative accuracy of CT numbers