[go: up one dir, main page]

Pereira et al., 2022 - Google Patents

Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods

Pereira et al., 2022

View HTML
Document ID
1713539267676600111
Author
Pereira A
Segundo H
Júnior L
Germano A
Carreiro A
Publication year
Publication venue
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

External Links

Snippet

Aim: Evaluate the accuracy between the intraoral and extraoral scanning regarding the three dimensional (3D) deviation and distances between the implants, through 2 scanning methods. Settings and Design: An in vitro study. Materials and Methods: An edentulous …
Continue reading at journals.lww.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C1/00—Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
    • A61C1/08—Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C1/082—Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills
    • A61C1/084—Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills of implanting tools
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A61C8/0048—Connecting the upper structure to the implant, e.g. bridging bars
    • A61C8/005—Connecting devices for joining an upper structure with an implant member, e.g. spacers
    • A61C8/0069—Connecting devices for joining an upper structure with an implant member, e.g. spacers tapered or conical connection
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A61C8/0001—Impression means for implants, e.g. impression coping
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A61C2008/0084—Provisional implants or abutments
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C11/00—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings
    • A61C11/08—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings with means to secure dental casts to articulator
    • A61C11/081—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings with means to secure dental casts to articulator with adjusting means thereof
    • A61C11/082—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings with means to secure dental casts to articulator with adjusting means thereof for rectilinear adjustment

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lerner et al. Artificial intelligence in fixed implant prosthodontics: a retrospective study of 106 implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns inserted in the posterior jaws of 90 patients
Revilla-León et al. Influence of rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vivo study
Erozan et al. Evaluation of the precision of different intraoral scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) software combinations in digital dentistry
García-Martínez et al. Influence of customized over-scan body rings on the intraoral scanning effectiveness of a multiple implant edentulous mandibular model
Rutkūnas et al. Intraoral scanners in implant prosthodontics. A narrative review
Çakmak et al. Effect of scanner type and scan body location on the accuracy of mandibular complete‐arch digital implant scans: an in vitro study
Luqmani et al. A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial
Kim et al. Influence of adjacent teeth on the accuracy of intraoral scanning systems for class II inlay preparation
Farhan et al. Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral digital impression system and conventional impression techniques for multiple implants in the full-arch edentulous mandible
Gómez-Polo et al. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations
Abduo et al. Seating accuracy of implant immediate provisional prostheses fabricated by digital workflow prior to implant placement by fully guided static computer‐assisted implant surgery: an in vitro study
Pozzi et al. Photogrammetry Versus Intraoral Scanning in Complete‐Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Anwar et al. Influence of a specially designed geometric device and modified scan bodies on the accuracy of a maxillary complete arch digital implant scan: An in vitro study
Pereira et al. Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods
Eldabe et al. Accuracy of intraoral photogrammetry in complete arch digital implant scanning: An in vivo prospective comparative study
Limones et al. Impact of the superimposition methods on accuracy analyses in complete-arch digital implant investigation
Jain et al. Accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners in recording impressions for full arch dental implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study
Donmez et al. Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment scan body system scans at different sites of maxilla after multiple repositioning of the scan body
Ramadan et al. Positional transfer accuracy of titanium base implant abutment provided by two different scan body designs: an invitro study
Hamilton et al. Influence of scanning protocol on the accuracy of complete‐arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study
Negreiros et al. Precision of complete-arch digital implant scans using photogrammetry and intra-oral scanning. An in vivo cross-over study.: Complete-Arch Implant Scans: Photogrammetry vs IOS
Berta et al. Prospective Clinical Study on the Accuracy of Static Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery in Patients With Distal Free‐End Implants. Conventional Versus CAD‐CAM Surgical Guides
Boehm et al. Effect of a calibration aid and the intraoral scanner on the registration of a partially edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study
Revilla-León et al. Registration accuracy of soft tissue information scan captured using an intraoral scanner and implant position scan recorded using extraoral and intraoral photogrammetry systems
Eldabe et al. Trueness of tooth modified scan bodies as a novel technique for edentulous full arch implant supported dental prosthesis: an in vivo prospective comparative study