[go: up one dir, main page]

McMahan et al., 2011 - Google Patents

Tool contact acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery

McMahan et al., 2011

Document ID
16213981306050209023
Author
McMahan W
Gewirtz J
Standish D
Martin P
Kunkel J
Lilavois M
Wedmid A
Lee D
Kuchenbecker K
Publication year
Publication venue
IEEE Transactions on Haptics

External Links

Snippet

Minimally invasive telerobotic surgical systems enable surgeons to perform complicated procedures without large incisions. Unfortunately, these systems typically do not provide the surgeon with sensory feedback aside from stereoscopic vision. We have, thus, developed …
Continue reading at ieeexplore.ieee.org (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B23/00—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes
    • G09B23/28—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine
    • G09B23/285—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine for injections, endoscopy, bronchoscopy, sigmoidscopy, insertion of contraceptive devices or enemas
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B23/00—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes
    • G09B23/28—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine
    • G09B23/288—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine for artificial respiration or heart massage
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B2017/00367—Details of actuation of instruments, e.g. relations between pushing buttons, or the like, and activation of the tool, working tip, or the like
    • A61B2017/00371—Multiple actuation, e.g. pushing of two buttons, or two working tips becoming operational
    • A61B2017/00384—Actuation of one tool by pushing two buttons simultaneously
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
McMahan et al. Tool contact acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery
Okamura Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery
Koehn et al. Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery
Kuchenbecker et al. VerroTouch: High-frequency acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery
Pacchierotti et al. Cutaneous feedback of fingertip deformation and vibration for palpation in robotic surgery
Wagner et al. The benefit of force feedback in surgery: Examination of blunt dissection
Westebring–van der Putten et al. Haptics in minimally invasive surgery–a review
Wagner et al. Force feedback benefit depends on experience in multiple degree of freedom robotic surgery task
Okamura et al. Haptics for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery
Gwilliam et al. Effects of haptic and graphical force feedback on teleoperated palpation
Bark et al. In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery
US9990856B2 (en) Systems and methods for providing vibration feedback in robotic systems
Wagner et al. The role of force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection
Kapoor et al. Haptics–Touchfeedback technology widening the horizon of medicine
Sun et al. Design and development of a da vinci surgical system simulator
Schorr et al. Tactor-induced skin stretch as a sensory substitution method in teleoperated palpation
Gosselin et al. Haptic systems for training sensorimotor skills: a use case in surgery
Talasaz et al. Effect of force feedback on performance of robotics-assisted suturing
US12354492B2 (en) Vibrotactile method, apparatus and system for training and practicing dental procedures
Seibold et al. Prototypic force feedback instrument for minimally invasive robotic surgery
Miller et al. Impact of haptic feedback on applied intracorporeal forces using a novel surgical robotic system—a randomized cross-over study with novices in an experimental setup
Okamura et al. Force feedback and sensory substitution for robot-assisted surgery
Machaca et al. Wrist-squeezing force feedback improves accuracy and speed in robotic surgery training
Rosenberg et al. A haptic interface for virtual simulation of endoscopic surgery
Machaca et al. Towards a ROS-based modular multi-modality haptic feedback system for robotic minimally invasive surgery training assessments