Mori et al., 2009 - Google Patents
Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profilesMori et al., 2009
View PDF- Document ID
- 15765125959037141848
- Author
- Mori I
- Machida Y
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Radiological physics and technology
External Links
Snippet
The point spread function (PSF) method is currently the one predominantly used to determine the modulation transfer function (MTF) of an X-ray CT system. However, the image examined with the PSF method must have a very high contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); it …
- 230000000051 modifying 0 title abstract description 11
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
- G06T11/003—Reconstruction from projections, e.g. tomography
- G06T11/005—Specific pre-processing for tomographic reconstruction, e.g. calibration, source positioning, rebinning, scatter correction, retrospective gating
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
- G06T11/003—Reconstruction from projections, e.g. tomography
- G06T11/006—Inverse problem, transformation from projection-space into object-space, e.g. transform methods, back-projection, algebraic methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
- G06T5/007—Dynamic range modification
- G06T5/008—Local, e.g. shadow enhancement
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
- G06T5/001—Image restoration
- G06T5/002—Denoising; Smoothing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10116—X-ray image
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/20—Special algorithmic details
- G06T2207/20048—Transform domain processing
- G06T2207/20056—Discrete and fast Fourier transform, [DFT, FFT]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10072—Tomographic images
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
- G06T5/20—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image by the use of local operators
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2211/00—Image generation
- G06T2211/40—Computed tomography
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T3/00—Geometric image transformation in the plane of the image, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a different image
- G06T3/40—Scaling the whole image or part thereof
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Mori et al. | Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profiles | |
| Chen et al. | Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods | |
| Samei et al. | Performance evaluation of computed tomography systems: summary of AAPM Task Group 233 | |
| Mori et al. | Photon starvation artifacts of X-ray CT: their true cause and a solution | |
| Gang et al. | Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone‐beam CT | |
| Richard et al. | Towards task‐based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms | |
| Hu et al. | Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach | |
| Evans et al. | Noise‐resolution tradeoffs in x‐ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms | |
| Li et al. | Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance | |
| Friedman et al. | A simple approach to measure computed tomography (CT) modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise‐power spectrum (NPS) using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom | |
| US9349198B2 (en) | Robust artifact reduction in image reconstruction | |
| Altunbas et al. | A post‐reconstruction method to correct cupping artifacts in cone beam breast computed tomography | |
| Takenaga et al. | Modulation transfer function measurement of CT images by use of a circular edge method with a logistic curve-fitting technique | |
| Liu et al. | An improved nonlinear diffusion in Laplacian pyramid domain for cone beam CT denoising during image-guided vascular intervention | |
| Ikejimba et al. | Task‐based strategy for optimized contrast enhanced breast imaging: analysis of six imaging techniques for mammography and tomosynthesis | |
| Cruz‐Bastida et al. | Impact of noise reduction schemes on quantitative accuracy of CT numbers | |
| Li et al. | Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT | |
| Magkos et al. | Direct Iterative Reconstruction of Computed Tomography Trajectories Reconstruction from limited number of projections with DIRECTT | |
| Setiawan et al. | Comparison of noise-power spectrum and modulation-transfer function for CT images reconstructed with iterative and deep learning image reconstructions: An initial experience study | |
| Shinohara et al. | Deep learning study on the mechanism of edge artifacts in point spread function reconstruction for numerical brain images | |
| Scarparo et al. | Evaluation of denoising digital breast tomosynthesis data in both projection and image domains and a study of noise model on digital breast tomosynthesis image domain | |
| Wang et al. | Backprojection Wiener deconvolution for computed tomographic reconstruction | |
| Kim et al. | A new software scheme for scatter correction based on a simple radiographic scattering model | |
| Plotzki et al. | The CTSimU software toolbox for CT-related image processing and quality assessment | |
| Bujila et al. | Practical approaches to approximating MTF and NPS in CT with an example application to task-based observer studies |