Benca et al., 2016 - Google Patents
The insufficiencies of risk analysis of impending pathological fractures in patients with femoral metastases: A literature reviewBenca et al., 2016
View HTML- Document ID
- 15002758855086081415
- Author
- Benca E
- Patsch J
- Mayr W
- Pahr D
- Windhager R
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Bone reports
External Links
Snippet
Purpose Pathologic fractures in patients with bone metastases are a common problem in clinical orthopaedic routine. On one hand recognition of metastatic lesions, which are at a high risk of fracture, is essential for timely prophylactic fixation, while on the other hand …
- 208000005250 Spontaneous Fracture 0 title abstract description 36
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/80—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4528—Joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4514—Cartilage
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4504—Bones
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/41—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the immune or lymphatic systems
- A61B5/414—Evaluating particular organs or parts of the immune or lymphatic systems
- A61B5/417—Evaluating particular organs or parts of the immune or lymphatic systems the bone marrow
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/345—Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Benca et al. | The insufficiencies of risk analysis of impending pathological fractures in patients with femoral metastases: A literature review | |
| Sternheim et al. | Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study | |
| Keaveny et al. | Biomechanical computed tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis | |
| Engelke et al. | FEA to measure bone strength: a review | |
| Poelert et al. | Patient-specific finite element modeling of bones | |
| McErlain et al. | Subchondral cysts create increased intra-osseous stress in early knee OA: a finite element analysis using simulated lesions | |
| Gong et al. | Relationships between femoral strength evaluated by nonlinear finite element analysis and BMD, material distribution and geometric morphology | |
| Benca et al. | Effect of simulated metastatic lesions on the biomechanical behavior of the proximal femur | |
| Kawabata et al. | The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method | |
| Marangalou et al. | A new approach to determine the accuracy of morphology–elasticity relationships in continuum FE analyses of human proximal femur | |
| Klets et al. | Estimation of the effect of body weight on the development of osteoarthritis based on cumulative stresses in cartilage: data from the osteoarthritis initiative | |
| Costa et al. | Effect of size and location of simulated lytic lesions on the structural properties of human vertebral bodies, a micro-finite element study | |
| Schwarzenberg et al. | Virtual mechanical tests out‐perform morphometric measures for assessment of mechanical stability of fracture healing in vivo | |
| Podshivalov et al. | On the road to personalized medicine: multiscale computational modeling of bone tissue | |
| Mathukumar et al. | Analysis and validation of femur bone data using finite element method under static load condition | |
| Dahan et al. | Finite element analyses for predicting anatomical neck fractures in the proximal humerus | |
| Villa-Camacho et al. | Computed tomography-based rigidity analysis: a review of the approach in preclinical and clinical studies | |
| Jun et al. | Quantification of regional variations in glenoid trabecular bone architecture and mineralization using clinical computed tomography images | |
| Jazinizadeh et al. | Advanced 2D image processing technique to predict hip fracture risk in an older population based on single DXA scans | |
| Rajapakse et al. | Influence of bone lesion location on femoral bone strength assessed by MRI-based finite-element modeling | |
| Alexander III et al. | Biomechanical model of a high risk impending pathologic fracture of the femur: lesion creation based on clinically implemented scoring systems | |
| Sas et al. | Fracture risk assessment and evaluation of femoroplasty in metastatic proximal femurs. An in vivo CT‐based finite element study | |
| Lee | Predicting failure load of the femur with simulated osteolytic defects using noninvasive imaging technique in a simplified load case | |
| Mimata et al. | Evaluation of bone healing process after intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fracture by quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis | |
| Anderson et al. | Evaluation of load-to-strength ratios in metastatic vertebrae and comparison with age-and sex-matched healthy individuals |