[go: up one dir, main page]

Prasad et al., 2002 - Google Patents

The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills

Prasad et al., 2002

Document ID
13890211820117844544
Author
Prasad S
Maniar H
Soper N
Damiano Jr R
Klingensmith M
Publication year
Publication venue
The American journal of surgery

External Links

Snippet

Background: We hypothesized that laparoscopic tasks performed with ZEUS robotic assistance would be done with greater precision and with a different learning curve than when performed in a standard laparoscopic trainer. Methods: Participants were divided into …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/04—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for suturing wounds; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B17/06—Needles ; Sutures; Needle-suture combinations; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
    • A61B17/3417—Details of tips or shafts, e.g. grooves, expandable, bendable; Multiple coaxial sliding cannulas, e.g. for dilating
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/04—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for suturing wounds; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B17/0469—Suturing instruments for use in minimally invasive surgery, e.g. endoscopic surgery
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/00234—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for minimally invasive surgery
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/11—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for performing anastomosis; Buttons for anastomosis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B23/00—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes
    • G09B23/28—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine
    • G09B23/285—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine for injections, endoscopy, bronchoscopy, sigmoidscopy, insertion of contraceptive devices or enemas
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/32—Surgical cutting instruments
    • A61B2017/320052—Guides for cutting instruments
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/068—Surgical staplers, e.g. containing multiple staples or clamps
    • A61B17/072—Surgical staplers, e.g. containing multiple staples or clamps for applying a row of staples in a single action, e.g. the staples being applied simultaneously
    • A61B17/07207—Surgical staplers, e.g. containing multiple staples or clamps for applying a row of staples in a single action, e.g. the staples being applied simultaneously the staples being applied sequentially
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B2017/00743—Type of operation; Specification of treatment sites

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Prasad et al. The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills
Hamdorf et al. Acquiring surgical skills
Prasad et al. Surgical robotics: impact of motion scaling on task performance
Chitwood Jr et al. Robotic surgical training in an academic institution
Tang et al. Analysis of errors enacted by surgical trainees during skills training courses
Chang et al. Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill
Sanchez et al. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Nio et al. Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks
Fransson et al. Effects of two training curricula on basic laparoscopic skills and surgical performance among veterinarians
Tocco et al. Innovation in internship preparation: an operative anatomy course increases senior medical students' knowledge and confidence
Ruurda et al. Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model
Maniar et al. Comparison of skill training with robotic systems and traditional endoscopy: implications on training and adoption
Perkins et al. Learning to use minimal access surgical instruments and 2-dimensional remote visual feedback: how difficult is the task for novices?
Woo et al. Robot-assisted pediatric surgery
Martinec et al. The trade-off between flexibility and maneuverability: task performance with articulating laparoscopic instruments
Lucereau et al. Learning curve of robotic-assisted anastomosis: shorter than the laparoscopic technique? An educational study
Boer et al. Time-action analysis of instrument positioners in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Kuang et al. Robotic-assisted vasovasostomy: a two-layer technique in an animal model
Ali et al. Teaching robotic surgery: a stepwise approach
Rodrigues et al. Tying different knots: what forces do we use?
Loukas et al. Deconstructing laparoscopic competence in a virtual reality simulation environment
Cassilly et al. Optimizing motion scaling and magnification in robotic surgery
Torres Bermudez et al. Laparoscopic intracorporal colorectal sutured anastomosis using the Radius Surgical System in a phantom model
Nio et al. Laparoscopic vascular anastomoses: does robotic (Zeus–Aesop) assistance help to overcome the learning curve?
Letouzey et al. Evaluation of a laparoscopic training program with or without robotic assistance