Popescu et al., 2008 - Google Patents
Modelling and robust control of a flexible beam quanser experimentPopescu et al., 2008
View PDF- Document ID
- 1237493808677851347
- Author
- Popescu D
- Sendrescu D
- Bobasu E
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Acta Montanistica Slovaca
External Links
Snippet
In this paper, the robust optimal model matching control design method is applied to a flexible beam Quanser experiment. The neglected nonlinearities of the real experiment in the controller design step lead to important differences between the simulation and …
- 238000000034 method 0 abstract description 12
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
- G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
- G05B19/19—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by positioning or contouring control systems, e.g. to control position from one programmed point to another or to control movement along a programmed continuous path
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
- G05B13/027—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion using neural networks only
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B11/00—Automatic controllers
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Mujumdar et al. | Observer-based sliding mode control for a class of noncommensurate fractional-order systems | |
| Naung et al. | Implementation of data driven control system of DC motor by using system identification process | |
| Frueh et al. | Linear quadratic optimal learning control (LQL) | |
| Jezernik et al. | Neural network sliding mode robot control | |
| Mills et al. | Nonlinear model predictive control of an inverted pendulum | |
| Dutta et al. | A new adaptive explicit nonlinear model predictive control design for a nonlinear mimo system: An application to twin rotor mimo system | |
| Pereira das Neves et al. | Model‐free control of mechatronic systems based on algebraic estimation | |
| Alfi et al. | Design and implementation of robust-fixed structure controller for telerobotic systems | |
| Korayem et al. | Application of the state‐dependent Riccati equation for flexible‐joint arms: Controller and estimator design | |
| Jia et al. | Improved dynamic parameter identification method relying on proprioception for manipulators | |
| Liu et al. | Full backstepping control in dynamic systems with air disturbances optimal estimation of a quadrotor | |
| Ates et al. | Online tuning of two degrees of freedom fractional order control loops | |
| Cruz et al. | Application of robust discontinuous control algorithm for a 5-DOF industrial robotic manipulator in real-time | |
| Li et al. | An integral method for parameter identification of a nonlinear robot subject to quantization error | |
| Korayem et al. | Wheel slippage compensation in mobile manipulators through combined kinematic, dynamic, and sliding mode control | |
| Popescu et al. | Modelling and robust control of a flexible beam quanser experiment | |
| Sahu et al. | Vision‐based tip position tracking control of two‐link flexible manipulator | |
| Montenegro et al. | Predictive dynamic matrix control (DMC) for ball and plate system used in a stewart robot | |
| Kim et al. | Motion control of industrial robots by considering serial two-link robot arm model with joint nonlinearities | |
| de Jesús Rubio et al. | References tracking and perturbations reconstruction in a Cartesian robot | |
| Cai et al. | Fourier series based learning control and application to positioning table | |
| Kostic | Data-driven robot motion control design | |
| Huang et al. | Continuous time model predictive control for a magnetic bearing system | |
| Song et al. | Dynamic parameter identification and adaptive control with trajectory scaling for robot-environment interaction | |
| Kia et al. | Modeling and simulation of a single gain tuning ADRC controller in Matlab/Simulink |