[go: up one dir, main page]

GILL et al., 2000 - Google Patents

ROBOTIC REMOTE LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY AND ADRENALECTOMY:: THE INITIAL EXPERIENCE

GILL et al., 2000

Document ID
12019205510647127269
Author
GILL I
SUNG G
HSU T
MERANEY A
Publication year
Publication venue
The Journal of urology

External Links

Snippet

PURPOSE: We evaluated the feasibility of performing laparoscopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy exclusively by using robotic telepresent technology from a remote workstation and compared outcomes with those of conventional laparoscopy in an acute …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B18/04Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by heating
    • A61B18/12Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by heating by passing a current through the tissue to be heated, e.g. high-frequency current
    • A61B18/14Probes or electrodes therefor
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/00234Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for minimally invasive surgery
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/28Surgical forceps
    • A61B17/29Forceps for use in minimally invasive surgery
    • A61B2017/2926Details of heads or jaws
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/34Trocars; Puncturing needles
    • A61B17/3417Details of tips or shafts, e.g. grooves, expandable, bendable; Multiple coaxial sliding cannulas, e.g. for dilating
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B2017/00831Material properties
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/32Surgical cutting instruments
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/12Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for ligaturing or otherwise compressing tubular parts of the body, e.g. blood vessels, umbilical cord

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
GILL et al. ROBOTIC REMOTE LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY AND ADRENALECTOMY:: THE INITIAL EXPERIENCE
Sung et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study
Sung et al. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems
Hashizume et al. A new era of robotic surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system
Barbon et al. Exploring the learning curve of a new robotic microsurgical system for microsurgery
Marchal et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients
Pugin et al. History of robotic surgery: from AESOP® and ZEUS® to da Vinci®
Reichenspurner et al. Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting
Nezhat et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy—a retrospective matched control study
Horgan et al. Robots in laparoscopic surgery
Gettman et al. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results
Falk et al. Quality of computer enhanced totally endoscopic coronary bypass graft anastomosis–comparison to conventional technique
Rassweiler et al. Telesurgical Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyInitial Experience
Narula et al. Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach
Bowersox et al. Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine
Hanly et al. Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the daVinci surgical system
Diodato et al. Robotic cardiac surgery: overview
Bowersox et al. Use of an intuitive telemanipulator system for remote trauma surgery: an experimental study
Katz et al. Robotics in microsurgery: use of a surgical robot to perform a free flap in a pig
deBeche-Adams et al. Early experience with the Senhance®-laparoscopic/robotic platform in the US
Kenngott et al. Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery
Garcia et al. Telerobotic manipulation of the brachial plexus
Lorincz et al. Robotics and the pediatric surgeon
Woo et al. Robot-assisted pediatric surgery
Yuh The Bedside Assistant in Robotic Surgery-Keys to Success.