GILL et al., 2000 - Google Patents
ROBOTIC REMOTE LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY AND ADRENALECTOMY:: THE INITIAL EXPERIENCEGILL et al., 2000
- Document ID
- 12019205510647127269
- Author
- GILL I
- SUNG G
- HSU T
- MERANEY A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- The Journal of urology
External Links
Snippet
PURPOSE: We evaluated the feasibility of performing laparoscopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy exclusively by using robotic telepresent technology from a remote workstation and compared outcomes with those of conventional laparoscopy in an acute …
- 238000004805 robotic 0 title abstract description 97
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B18/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
- A61B18/04—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by heating
- A61B18/12—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by heating by passing a current through the tissue to be heated, e.g. high-frequency current
- A61B18/14—Probes or electrodes therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/00234—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for minimally invasive surgery
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/28—Surgical forceps
- A61B17/29—Forceps for use in minimally invasive surgery
- A61B2017/2926—Details of heads or jaws
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
- A61B17/3417—Details of tips or shafts, e.g. grooves, expandable, bendable; Multiple coaxial sliding cannulas, e.g. for dilating
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00831—Material properties
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/32—Surgical cutting instruments
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/12—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for ligaturing or otherwise compressing tubular parts of the body, e.g. blood vessels, umbilical cord
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| GILL et al. | ROBOTIC REMOTE LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY AND ADRENALECTOMY:: THE INITIAL EXPERIENCE | |
| Sung et al. | Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study | |
| Sung et al. | Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems | |
| Hashizume et al. | A new era of robotic surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system | |
| Barbon et al. | Exploring the learning curve of a new robotic microsurgical system for microsurgery | |
| Marchal et al. | Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients | |
| Pugin et al. | History of robotic surgery: from AESOP® and ZEUS® to da Vinci® | |
| Reichenspurner et al. | Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting | |
| Nezhat et al. | Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy—a retrospective matched control study | |
| Horgan et al. | Robots in laparoscopic surgery | |
| Gettman et al. | A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results | |
| Falk et al. | Quality of computer enhanced totally endoscopic coronary bypass graft anastomosis–comparison to conventional technique | |
| Rassweiler et al. | Telesurgical Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyInitial Experience | |
| Narula et al. | Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach | |
| Bowersox et al. | Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine | |
| Hanly et al. | Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the daVinci surgical system | |
| Diodato et al. | Robotic cardiac surgery: overview | |
| Bowersox et al. | Use of an intuitive telemanipulator system for remote trauma surgery: an experimental study | |
| Katz et al. | Robotics in microsurgery: use of a surgical robot to perform a free flap in a pig | |
| deBeche-Adams et al. | Early experience with the Senhance®-laparoscopic/robotic platform in the US | |
| Kenngott et al. | Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery | |
| Garcia et al. | Telerobotic manipulation of the brachial plexus | |
| Lorincz et al. | Robotics and the pediatric surgeon | |
| Woo et al. | Robot-assisted pediatric surgery | |
| Yuh | The Bedside Assistant in Robotic Surgery-Keys to Success. |