Conway, 1995 - Google Patents
The use of in vitro models to assess interactions between human microbiota and genetically modified microorganismsConway, 1995
View PDF- Document ID
- 9969341386612036853
- Author
- Conway P
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease
External Links
Snippet
There is a rapidly developing need to understand the risks to human health which can occur in association with the introduction of genetically modified microorganisms (GMMOs). Carefully designed microcosms which bridge the gap between the test tube and the human …
- 241000736262 Microbiota 0 title abstract description 26
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
- A61K35/66—Micro-organisms or materials therefrom
- A61K35/74—Bacteria
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES OR MICRO-ORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/02—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable micro-organisms
- C12Q1/025—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable micro-organisms for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICRO-ORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING OR MAINTAINING MICRO-ORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N1/00—Micro-organisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving micro-organisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a micro-organism; Culture media therefor
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Engevik et al. | Mucin-degrading microbes release monosaccharides that chemoattract Clostridioides difficile and facilitate colonization of the human intestinal mucus layer | |
| Cozzolino et al. | Preliminary evaluation of the safety and probiotic potential of Akkermansia muciniphila DSM 22959 in comparison with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG | |
| Leser et al. | Germination and outgrowth of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis spores in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs | |
| Barba-Vidal et al. | The probiotic combination of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis CECT 7210 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BPL6 reduces pathogen loads and improves gut health of weaned piglets orally challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium | |
| Neville et al. | Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus salivarius and closely related Lactobacillus species | |
| Yahav et al. | Encapsulation of beneficial probiotic bacteria in extracellular matrix from biofilm-forming Bacillus subtilis | |
| Dunne | Adaptation of bacteria to the intestinal niche: probiotics and gut disorder | |
| Hernandez-Mendoza et al. | Screening of Lactobacillus casei strains for their ability to bind aflatoxin B1 | |
| Wassenaar et al. | Colonization of chicks by motility mutants of Campylobacter jejuni demonstrates the importance of flagellin A expression | |
| Nader-Macías et al. | Advances in the design of probiotic products for the prevention of major diseases in dairy cattle | |
| Barba-Vidal et al. | Evaluation of the probiotic strain Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis CECT 7210 capacities to improve health status and fight digestive pathogens in a piglet model | |
| Tannock | New perceptions of the gut microbiota: implications for future research | |
| Grześkowiak et al. | Pathogen exclusion properties of canine probiotics are influenced by the growth media and physical treatments simulating industrial processes | |
| Tao et al. | Database and bioinformatics studies of probiotics | |
| Grispoldi et al. | How to assess in vitro probiotic viability and the correct use of neutralizing agents | |
| Wang et al. | Screening of lactic acid bacteria with inhibitory activity against ETEC K88 as feed additive and the effects on sows and piglets | |
| Conway | The use of in vitro models to assess interactions between human microbiota and genetically modified microorganisms | |
| Park et al. | Comparison of pH and bile resistance of Lactobacillus acidophilus strains isolated from rat, pig, chicken, and human sources | |
| Mirelahi et al. | Investigation of acid and bile tolerance of native lactobacilli isolated from fecal samples and commercial probiotics by growth and survival studies | |
| Splichal et al. | Colonization of germ-free piglets with commensal Lactobacillus amylovorus, Lactobacillus mucosae, and probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 and their interference with Salmonella Typhimurium | |
| Dumitru et al. | Evaluation of non-encapsulated and microencapsulated lactic acid bacteria | |
| Ren et al. | Screening of host specific lactic acid bacteria active against Escherichia coli from massive sample pools with a combination of in vitro and ex vivo methods | |
| DUMITRU et al. | Preliminary Characterization of the Probiotic Properties of a Bacterial Strain for Used in Monogastric Nutrition. | |
| Splichalova et al. | Colonization of germ-free piglets with mucinolytic and non-mucinolytic Bifidobacterium boum strains isolated from the intestine of wild boar and their interference with Salmonella Typhimurium | |
| Eveno et al. | Compatibility, cytotoxicity, and gastrointestinal tenacity of bacteriocin-producing bacteria selected for a consortium probiotic formulation to be used in livestock feed |