Bovaird et al., 2008 - Google Patents
Modern measurement in the social sciencesBovaird et al., 2008
View PDF- Document ID
- 86497002660695639
- Author
- Bovaird J
- Embretson S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- The Sage handbook of social research methods
External Links
Snippet
While item response theory (IRT) is a viable and well-established methodology for educational measures, it is still relatively unused in psychology and the rest of the social sciences. Despite its underutilization in the mainstream of social research, IRT is appropriate …
- 238000005259 measurement 0 title abstract description 53
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/06—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers
- G09B7/07—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers providing for individual presentation of questions to a plurality of student stations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
- G09B19/02—Counting; Calculating
- G09B19/025—Counting; Calculating with electrically operated apparatus or devices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/36—Computer-assisted acquisition of medical data, e.g. computerised clinical trials or questionnaires
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B23/00—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes
- G09B23/28—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
- G09B5/02—Electrically-operated educational appliances with visual presentation of the material to be studied, e.g. using film strip
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Bolt et al. | A mixture item response model for multiple-choice data | |
| Robie et al. | Measurement equivalence between applicant and incumbent groups: An IRT analysis of personality scales | |
| Rosário et al. | Homework purposes, homework behaviors, and academic achievement. Examining the mediating role of students’ perceived homework quality | |
| Kyriakides | Drawing from teacher effectivess research and research into teacher interpersonal behaviour to establish a teacher evaluation system: A study on the use of student ratings to evaluate teacher behaviour | |
| Kuhfeld et al. | Avoiding bias from sum scores in growth estimates: An examination of IRT-based approaches to scoring longitudinal survey responses. | |
| Meijer et al. | Methodology review: Evaluating person fit | |
| Muraki et al. | Equating and linking of performance assessments | |
| van de Vijver et al. | Testing across cultures | |
| Hattie et al. | Chapter 11: Persistent methodological questions in educational testing | |
| Topping et al. | Teacher effectiveness and computer assessment of reading relating value added and learning information system data | |
| Hambleton et al. | Competency Test Development, Validation, and Standard-Setting. | |
| Bulut | Between-person and within-person subscore reliability: Comparison of unidimensional and multidimensional IRT models | |
| Alexander et al. | What responses to domain-specific analogy problems reveal about emerging competence: A new perspective on an old acquaintance. | |
| Irwing et al. | Some evidence for the existence of a general factor of semantic memory and its components | |
| Haladyna et al. | An evaluation of conjunctive and compensatory standard-setting strategies for test decisions | |
| Wolfe et al. | Barriers to the implementation of portfolio assessment in secondary education | |
| Bovaird et al. | Modern measurement in the social sciences | |
| Klein | The failure of a decision support system: inconsistency in test grading by teachers | |
| Majoros et al. | Motivation towards mathematics from 1980 to 2015: Exploring the feasibility of trend scaling | |
| Merydith et al. | Reconsidering response sets, test-taking attitudes, dissimulation, self-deception, and social desirability | |
| Effatpanah et al. | Differential Item Functioning Analysis of Likert Scales: An Overview and Demonstration of Rating Scale Tree Model | |
| Dorans et al. | Equity assessment for polytomously scored items: A taxonomy of procedures for assessing differential item functioning 1 | |
| Monroe | Item response theory | |
| Bezirhan | Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models | |
| Ye | Diagnostic assessment of urban middle school student learning of pre-algebra patterns |