[go: up one dir, main page]

Putzer et al., 2016 - Google Patents

Manual versus mechanical chest compressions on surfaces of varying softness with or without backboards: a randomized, crossover manikin study

Putzer et al., 2016

View PDF
Document ID
6039723930746065590
Author
Putzer G
Fiala A
Braun P
Neururer S
Biechl K
Keilig B
Ploner W
Fop E
Paal P
Publication year
Publication venue
The Journal of Emergency Medicine

External Links

Snippet

Background Chest compression quality is decisive for overall outcome after cardiac arrest. Chest compression depth may decrease when cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed on a mattress, and the use of a backboard does not necessarily improve …
Continue reading at files.commons.gc.cuny.edu (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/38—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for producing shock effects
    • A61N1/39—Heart defibrillators
    • A61N1/3925—Monitoring; Protecting
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/38—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for producing shock effects
    • A61N1/39—Heart defibrillators
    • A61N1/3968—Constructional arrangements, e.g. casings
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
    • A61H31/00—Artificial respiration or heart stimulation
    • A61H31/004—Heart stimulation
    • A61H31/007—Manual driven
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
    • A61H31/00—Artificial respiration or heart stimulation
    • A61H31/004—Heart stimulation
    • A61H31/006—Power driven
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
    • A61H2201/00—Characteristics of apparatus not provided for in the preceding codes
    • A61H2201/50—Control means thereof
    • A61H2201/5058—Sensors or detectors
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
    • A61H31/00—Artificial respiration or heart stimulation
    • A61H31/008—Supine patient supports or bases, e.g. improving air-way access to the lungs
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Putzer et al. Manual versus mechanical chest compressions on surfaces of varying softness with or without backboards: a randomized, crossover manikin study
Kramer-Johansen et al. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study
Qvigstad et al. Clinical pilot study of different hand positions during manual chest compressions monitored with capnography
Sugerman et al. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study
Sullivan et al. Simulation exercise to improve retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation priorities for in-hospital cardiac arrests: a randomized controlled trial
Aufderheide et al. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression–decompression techniques
Smekal et al. A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Yost et al. Assessment of CPR interruptions from transthoracic impedance during use of the LUCAS™ mechanical chest compression system
Perkins et al. A comparison between over-the-head and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Nishisaki et al. Effect of mattress deflection on CPR quality assessment for older children and adolescents
Fischer et al. Effects and limitations of an AED with audiovisual feedback for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized manikin study
Metzger et al. Improved cerebral perfusion pressures and 24-hr neurological survival in a porcine model of cardiac arrest with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure
Babbs Interposed abdominal compression CPR: a comprehensive evidence based review
Greingor Quality of cardiac massage with ratio compression–ventilation 5/1 and 15/2
Souchtchenko et al. A review of chest compression interruptions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and strategies for the future
Hong et al. The most effective rescuer's position for cardiopulmonary resuscitation provided to patients on beds: a randomized, controlled, crossover mannequin study
Thayne et al. Use of an impedance threshold device improves short-term outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Fischer et al. A manually powered mechanical resuscitation device used by a single rescuer: a randomised controlled manikin study
Fischer et al. Quality of resuscitation: Flight attendants in an airplane simulator use a new mechanical resuscitation device—A randomized simulation study
Maignan et al. Impact of laryngeal tube use on chest compression fraction during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A prospective alternate month study
Zoeller et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with a Nuss bar—a case report and review of the literature
Oh et al. A novel method to decrease mattress compression during CPR using a mattress compression cover and a vacuum pump
Aufderheide et al. From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems: new understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest
Hinkelbein et al. The message is clear to save an additional 100 000 lives per year in Europe:‘harder and faster for cardiopulmonary resuscitation’!
Nikandish et al. Role of dominant versus non-dominant hand position during uninterrupted chest compression CPR by novice rescuers: a randomized double-blind crossover study