Delaunay et al., 2022 - Google Patents
Des3PI: a fragment-based approach to design cyclic peptides targeting protein–protein interactionsDelaunay et al., 2022
- Document ID
- 4819962243720975320
- Author
- Delaunay M
- Ha-Duong T
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
External Links
Snippet
Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) play crucial roles in many cellular processes and their deregulation often leads to cellular dysfunctions. One promising way to modulate PPIs is to use peptide derivatives that bind their protein target with high affinity and high specificity …
- 230000004850 protein–protein interaction 0 title abstract description 24
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/10—Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology
- G06F19/16—Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology for molecular structure, e.g. structure alignment, structural or functional relations, protein folding, domain topologies, drug targeting using structure data, involving two-dimensional or three-dimensional structures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
- G01N33/6803—General methods of protein analysis not limited to specific proteins or families of proteins
- G01N33/6842—Proteomic analysis of subsets of protein mixtures with reduced complexity, e.g. membrane proteins, phosphoproteins, organelle proteins
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/70—Chemoinformatics, i.e. data processing methods or systems for the retrieval, analysis, visualisation, or storage of physicochemical or structural data of chemical compounds
- G06F19/706—Chemoinformatics, i.e. data processing methods or systems for the retrieval, analysis, visualisation, or storage of physicochemical or structural data of chemical compounds for drug design with the emphasis on a therapeutic agent, e.g. ligand-biological target interactions, pharmacophore generation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/10—Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology
- G06F19/28—Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology for programming tools or database systems, e.g. ontologies, heterogeneous data integration, data warehousing or computing architectures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/10—Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology
- G06F19/18—Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology for functional genomics or proteomics, e.g. genotype-phenotype associations, linkage disequilibrium, population genetics, binding site identification, mutagenesis, genotyping or genome annotation, protein-protein interactions or protein-nucleic acid interactions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/10—Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology
- G06F19/12—Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology for modelling or simulation in systems biology, e.g. probabilistic or dynamic models, gene-regulatory networks, protein interaction networks or metabolic networks
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Zhou et al. | Systematic comparison and comprehensive evaluation of 80 amino acid descriptors in peptide QSAR modeling | |
| Ustach et al. | Optimization and evaluation of site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) as a tool for target-based ligand optimization | |
| Ericksen et al. | Machine learning consensus scoring improves performance across targets in structure-based virtual screening | |
| Huang et al. | Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein− ligand interactions | |
| Onufriev et al. | Modification of the generalized Born model suitable for macromolecules | |
| McHugh et al. | Insights into how cyclic peptides switch conformations | |
| Yin et al. | MedusaScore: an accurate force field-based scoring function for virtual drug screening | |
| Bakan et al. | Druggability assessment of allosteric proteins by dynamics simulations in the presence of probe molecules | |
| Nittinger et al. | Evidence of Water Molecules A Statistical Evaluation of Water Molecules Based on Electron Density | |
| Ross et al. | Replica-exchange and standard state binding free energies with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo | |
| Haider et al. | Combining solvent thermodynamic profiles with functionality maps of the Hsp90 binding site to predict the displacement of water molecules | |
| Wahl et al. | Assessing the predictive power of relative binding free energy calculations for test cases involving displacement of binding site water molecules | |
| Das et al. | Binding affinity prediction with property-encoded shape distribution signatures | |
| Hoffer et al. | In silico fragment-based drug discovery: setup and validation of a fragment-to-lead computational protocol using S4MPLE | |
| Delaunay et al. | Des3PI: a fragment-based approach to design cyclic peptides targeting protein–protein interactions | |
| Allen et al. | Development and validation of the quantum mechanical bespoke protein force field | |
| Spiga et al. | Electrostatic-consistent coarse-grained potentials for molecular simulations of proteins | |
| Sun et al. | An azo coupling-based chemoproteomic approach to systematically profile the tyrosine reactivity in the human proteome | |
| Cai et al. | Basis for Accurate Protein p K a prediction with Machine Learning | |
| Wu et al. | K-means clustering coarse-graining (KMC-CG): A next generation methodology for determining optimal coarse-grained mappings of large biomolecules | |
| Garay et al. | Post-translational modifications at the coarse-grained level with the SIRAH force field | |
| Ritchie et al. | Understanding and manipulating electrostatic fields at the protein–protein interface using vibrational spectroscopy and continuum electrostatics calculations | |
| Yang et al. | Analysis of factors influencing hydration site prediction based on molecular dynamics simulations | |
| Klebe | Protein modeling and structure-based drug design | |
| Li et al. | Repulsive soft-core potentials for efficient alchemical free energy calculations |