Oshin et al., 2023 - Google Patents
Differentiable robust model predictive controlOshin et al., 2023
View PDF- Document ID
- 4009029297026599135
- Author
- Oshin A
- Almubarak H
- Theodorou E
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08426
External Links
Snippet
Deterministic model predictive control (MPC), while powerful, is often insufficient for effectively controlling autonomous systems in the real-world. Factors such as environmental noise and model error can cause deviations from the expected nominal performance …
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
- G05B13/027—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion using neural networks only
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/39—Robotics, robotics to robotics hand
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
- G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G06N99/005—Learning machines, i.e. computer in which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the machine itself during a complete run
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computer systems based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Computer systems based on biological models using neural network models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
- G06N5/02—Knowledge representation
- G06N5/022—Knowledge engineering, knowledge acquisition
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B11/00—Automatic controllers
- G05B11/01—Automatic controllers electric
- G05B11/32—Automatic controllers electric with inputs from more than one sensing element; with outputs to more than one correcting element
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Lew et al. | Safe active dynamics learning and control: A sequential exploration–exploitation framework | |
| Oshin et al. | Differentiable robust model predictive control | |
| Marcucci et al. | Approximate hybrid model predictive control for multi-contact push recovery in complex environments | |
| Majumdar et al. | Control design along trajectories with sums of squares programming | |
| Rizzi et al. | Robust sampling-based control of mobile manipulators for interaction with articulated objects | |
| Ubellacker et al. | Verifying safe transitions between dynamic motion primitives on legged robots | |
| Arab et al. | Optimal control of wheeled mobile robots: From simulation to real world | |
| Umlauft et al. | Bayesian uncertainty modeling for programming by demonstration | |
| Lopez et al. | Robust collision avoidance via sliding control | |
| Iftikhar et al. | Nonlinear model predictive control of an overhead laboratory-scale gantry crane with obstacle avoidance | |
| Csomay-Shanklin et al. | Robust agility via learned zero dynamics policies | |
| Zhou et al. | Time varying control set design for uav collision avoidance using reachable tubes | |
| Gourdeau et al. | Adaptive control of robotic manipulators using an extended Kalman filter | |
| Alcan et al. | Trajectory optimization on matrix lie groups with differential dynamic programming and nonlinear constraints | |
| Almubarak et al. | Gaussian process barrier states for safe trajectory optimization and control | |
| Berthier et al. | Fast and robust stability region estimation for nonlinear dynamical systems | |
| Lopez et al. | Decomposing control lyapunov functions for efficient reinforcement learning | |
| Davoodi et al. | Probabilistic movement primitive control via control barrier functions | |
| Li et al. | Robust and Safe Autonomous Navigation for Systems with Learned SE (3) Hamiltonian Dynamics | |
| Lieu | Predictive Control of Constrained Nonlinear Systems | |
| Lunardi | Safe Model Predictive Control for Robotic Manipulation and Locomotion | |
| Zhang et al. | A time-dependent symplectic network for non-convex path planning problems with linear and nonlinear dynamics | |
| Katayama | Fast Model Predictive Control of Robotic Systems with Rigid Contacts | |
| Lai | A machine learning approach to trajectory planning for unmanned aerial vehicles | |
| Tanner et al. | Data-Driven Abstractions for Robots With Stochastic Dynamics |