8000 Make shop contracts consequential and invoices trustworthy by 00ainick-cmd · Pull Request #1 · 00ainick-cmd/aea-shop-tycoon · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
F438

Make shop contracts consequential and invoices trustworthy - #1

Draft
00ainick-cmd wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/shop-tycoon-economy
Draft

00ainick-cmd wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/shop-tycoon-economy

Conversation

@00ainick-cmd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The opening now gives players three connected contracts, a supplier-delay decision with real invoice/date consequences, and a recap of promises kept. This turns the audit's proposed management tradeoff into playable work using the existing job definitions and game shell.

Fixes annual dealer fees being charged monthly, current overhead landing on the following invoice, and repeat quote acceptance awarding charisma. Quotes/floor now expose operating costs. Delivery reviews measure the actual promise independently of diagnostic correctness. Random HF triggering is removed; unrelated random events are suppressed during the opening. Native job/crew controls, contrast, wrapping and click-obstruction fixes improve phone and keyboard play.

Validation: 48 existing self-tests, 14 new actual-engine regressions (including a complete fee year and concurrent deliveries), keyboard startup through job assignment, and browser completion of all three supplier choices passed. Phone and desktop screenshots inspected; no page errors in successful playthroughs. Full award-completion and member engagement testing remain.

The single-file, session-only game and existing technical questions are preserved. Remaining audit work is recorded in docs/plans/2026-09-09-opening-contracts.md. Draft for Nick's review; merging main updates GitHub Pages, so no merge or deployment was performed.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

0