8000 docs: finalize v3 benchmark coverage matrix (Refs #776) by adityamukho · Pull Request #834 · project-minigraf/minigraf · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

docs: finalize v3 benchmark coverage matrix (Refs #776) - #834

Merged
adityamukho merged 1 commit into
v3from
docs/776-final-matrix
Nov 3, 2026
Merged

adityamukho merged 1 commit into
v3from
docs/776-final-matrix

Conversation

@adityamukho
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Refs #776.

Finalize the v3 benchmark matrix after merged P01–P17: give all 41 rows an explicit disposition, map G01–G18 to their merged PRs, refresh revision provenance, and replace the phase-one plan with verified execution evidence and remaining exclusions.

Validation dispatch 41642356471 ran 427 native Criterion IDs and 26 separate foreign-runtime IDs. Retained artifacts recover the query job's exact 146/146/146 counts. Public Bencher metrics at the measured SHA were verified for all 453 IDs. The document explicitly records missing numeric comparison baselines, unobserved revised acceptance scheduling, manual binding/scaling checks, and unverified live alert delivery. Issue #776 stays open.

Validation: exact ID/selection/analysis/upload reconciliation; matrix, gap-map, table and relative-link checks; merged-PR ancestry; SHA-specific Bencher metric/threshold checks; 17 reporting tests passed; git diff --check passed; read-only gpt-6-astra review found no issues. Only docs/bench-coverage-v3.md changes; no build or timed workload was run for this documentation update.

🤖 Generated with Codex, orchestrated by Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
@adityamukho
adityamukho merged commit c5863c7 into v3 Nov 3, 2026
18 checks passed
@adityamukho
adityamukho deleted the docs/776-final-matrix branch November 3, 2026 14:20
@codecov
codecov Bot commented Nov 3, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

0