8000 Remove Quarkus Reactive Routes extension by michalvavrik · Pull Request #49024 · keycloak/keycloak · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Remove Quarkus Reactive Routes extension - #49024

Merged
shawkins merged 1 commit into
keycloak:mainfrom
michalvavrik:chore/issues/49023
May 15, 2026
Merged

Remove Quarkus Reactive Routes extension#49024
shawkins merged 1 commit into
keycloak:mainfrom
michalvavrik:chore/issues/49023

Conversation

@michalvavrik
@michalvavrik michalvavrik commented May 15, 2026 •
edited
Loading
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@michalvavrik
michalvavrik requested review from a team as code owners May 15, 2026 14:42
@michalvavrik
chore(quarkus): remove reactive routes extension
37392ef 
* Closes: keycloak#49023

Signed-off-by: Michal Vavřík <michal.vavrik@aol.com>
@michalvavrik
michalvavrik requested a review from shawkins May 15, 2026 16:41
shawkins
shawkins approved these changes May 15, 2026
View reviewed changes

@shawkins shawkins left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shawkins
shawkins merged commit 213ff92 into keycloak:main May 15, 2026
90 checks passed
@michalvavrik
michalvavrik deleted the chore/issues/49023 branch May 15, 2026 18:21
@stianst stianst mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Closed
sashyo pushed a commit to tide-foundation/keycloak-IGA that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2026
@michalvavrik @sashyo
chore(quarkus): remove reactive routes extension (keycloak#49024)
d992060 
* Closes: keycloak#49023

Signed-off-by: Michal Vavřík <michal.vavrik@aol.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@shawkins shawkins shawkins approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

team/cloud-native

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove Quarkus Reactive Routes as it is surplus to requirements

2 participants

@michalvavrik @shawkins
0