8000 Multi-Objective Support in InfiniteOpt by PetiteChouette · Pull Request #434 · infiniteopt/InfiniteOpt.jl · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Multi-Objective Support in InfiniteOpt - #434

Merged
pulsipher merged 12 commits into
infiniteopt:masterfrom
PetiteChouette:master
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

pulsipher merged 12 commits into
infiniteopt:masterfrom
PetiteChouette:master

Conversation

@PetiteChouette
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added support for multiple objectives within InfiniteOpt by modifying the previous support for scalars to vectors of scalars. Modified the relevant doc strings and added a subsection in the objective Markdown file.

@codecov
codecov Bot commented Jun 18, 2026 •
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.77%. Comparing base (40c897d) to head (06c72ae).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #434   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.77%   99.77%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines        6797     6810   +13     
=======================================
+ Hits         6782     6795   +13     
  Misses         15       15           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@pulsipher pulsipher left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this. A few things:

  • The rocket example should be added/altered in a separate PR
  • The documentation on multi-objectives should mention something about what solvers support this (e.g., MultiObjectiveAlgorithms.jl) and perhaps even link to the JuMP docs on this.
  • Please also add unit tests to test this new functionality.

@pulsipher pulsipher mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2026
1 of 6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

0