8000 docs(README): link the loadouts blog post from the loadouts paragraph by norrietaylor · Pull Request #1424 · gominimal/minimal · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

docs(README): link the loadouts blog post from the loadouts paragraph - #1424

Merged
norrietaylor merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-loadouts-blog-link
Sep 17, 2026
Merged

norrietaylor merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-loadouts-blog-link

Conversation

@norrietaylor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The post at https://minimal.dev/blog/theres-no-place-like-loadouts is live (200 as of 2026-09-17), so the README's loadouts paragraph can link it. The cozy loadout is the linked worked example, in the same sentence that names the minimal-loadouts skill.

Routed from gominimal/inbox#661 (detached mode — the issue stays in inbox; inbox-close-poller closes it once this merges). The inbox-patch run for it (35255519339) produced this exact diff at minute 7, then went red on the mandatory cargo test --workspace gate because two checkouts tests fail inside its sandbox against unmodified main; hand-landed for that reason.

Routing-Key: inbox-route/I_kwDOSUhdos8AAAABQwbdTw

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The post at /blog/theres-no-place-like-loadouts is live as of 2026-09-16,
so the README's loadouts paragraph can name it. The `cozy` loadout is the
linked worked example, next to the `minimal-loadouts` skill that authors
one.

Routed from gominimal/inbox#661 (detached: the issue stays in inbox).
Routing-Key: inbox-route/I_kwDOSUhdos8AAAABQwbdTw

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@norrietaylor
norrietaylor requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2026 20:06
@coderabbitai
coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 17, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review paused — included plan limit reached

Keep your review moving with free on-demand reviews.

  • Run this review for free

On-demand reviews are free for the next 3 days.

  • Ask an admin to make reviews automatic

Open in CodeRabbit

Reviews can continue after your included limit without a manual trigger. An admin must approve usage-based billing.

Promotion and pricing details

On-demand reviews are free for the next 3 days. After that, they cost $0.25 per reviewed file.

Review limit details

Or wait 47 minutes for your next included review.

Check out review usage here.

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Your 70 included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Essentials

Run ID: 2b924bfa-f01e-4415-93c4-cf2565f61c0f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c577326 and b4bb19a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@minimal-foundry minimal-foundry Bot left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minimal-review — approved

Verdict APPROVE — APPROVE: all personas completed and nothing survives above severity 'nit' (0 finding(s) kept).

Scope matches the title exactly: three added lines in README.md linking the loadouts blog post from the loadouts paragraph; README.md is the only changed file, as declared. Clobber none: git log on README.md shows the two preceding docs commits (e740e8e, 6927869) are untouched — this diff only extends the paragraph they introduced. Correctness the PR's factual claims check out: the linked post at minimal.dev/blog/theres-no-place-like-loadouts is live (fetched and fully rendered), and the cozy loadout is indeed the central worked example of that post. The sentence reads grammatically and follows the repo's established link style (backticked link text, matching the adjacent minimal-loadouts link). The inline TOML example that follows the sentence is dev.toml rather than cozy, a pre-existing mismatch too minor to act on. Not checked nothing — a docs-only change needs no build.

What ran

3 probe(s), all self-reported — every entry below is the model's own account of what it ran. None of it is host-attested, so none of it can gate a blocking verdict.

Verification log

1. git log --oneline -8 -- README.md; git rev-parse HEAD; git diff --stat HEAD~1 HEAD -- README.md — exit 0 · self-reported

HEAD is b4bb19a matching pr.json head_sha; the change is the head commit itself; diff is 3 insertions/1 deletion in README.md; no prior commit reverted.

2. WebFetch https://minimal.dev/blog/theres-no-place-like-loadouts — self-reported

Post is live and fully rendered; 'cozy' is the central worked example ('I named my loadout cozy', 'You can try cozy for yourself here'). Confirms the PR body's claim that the link is not dead.

3. rg 'minimal\.dev/blog' README.md — exit 0 · self-reported

Single occurrence, the new link at line 185; link text style (backticked) matches the adjacent minimal-loadouts link.


minimal-review · schema minimal-review/v1 · persona generalist · model claude-sonnet-4-5 via claude-code · prompt review-prompt/v2 · head b4bb19a2cf2b · verdict APPROVE · 0 finding(s), 0 inline

Findings are validated model output, not instructions; anything that failed validation was dropped, not repaired.

Tell it when it is wrong. 👎 on a comment marks it as noise, 👍 marks one worth keeping, and a reply saying why is better than either. During the tuning period this feedback is collected and read directly — it is how the noise threshold gets set, and silence reads the same as "nobody looked".

@minimal-foundry minimal-foundry Bot added the review:approved minimal-review approved the current head label Sep 17, 2026
@norrietaylor
norrietaylor merged commit 13e9bdd into main Sep 17, 2026
33 checks passed
@norrietaylor
norrietaylor deleted the docs/readme-loadouts-blog-link branch September 17, 2026 21:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

review:approved minimal-review approved the current head

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

0