You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2026. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2026. It is now read-only.
What is the upstreaming plan for SGX SDK patches from Google? #63
Looking at sgx_x86_64/linux_sgx_2_9.patch. Will this be maintained as a patch going forward or integrated into Intel SGX SDK? Also, is the upstreaming and rebasing of the patch on a new SGX SDK done periodically?
Some aspects of our patch have been open PRs on SGX SDK for years. We have
contributed several PRs that have been merged and removed from our patch in
subsequent updates.
We’ve been updating our patch with SGX SDK releases since version 1.9. We
use only a small part of the SGX SDK, and we don’t provide compatibility
with all their features, like switchless functions, so we don’t always
upgrade immediately. Sometimes upgrades are easy, sometimes they take a
month or longer. The releases after 2.9 (after the pandemic lockdowns) have
been focused on areas of the SDK we don’t touch.
Regards,
Seth
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 1:59 PM asmprogrammer5 ***@***.***> wrote:
Looking at sgx_x86_64/linux_sgx_2_9.patch. Will this be maintained as a
patch going forward or integrated into Intel SGX SDK? Also, is the
upstreaming and rebasing of the patch on a new SGX SDK done periodically?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#63>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEALJDSUJXXTL2BUPT2OJ7DSVJ5KVANCNFSM4VAJ3NJA>
.
Activity
sethmoo commentedon Dec 21, 2020