[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
/ writ Public

Minimal command pattern implementation on top of Scrivener

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

foca/writ

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

5 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Writ: A minimal command pattern implementation

Build Status RubyGem

writ, noun:
         a form of written command in the name of a court or other legal authority to act, or abstain from acting, in some way.

Writ is a minimal command pattern implementation, including input validation, built on top of Scrivener.

Example

# Define your commands
class LogIn < Writ
  attr_accessor :email
  attr_accessor :password

  def validate
    assert_email :email
    assert_present :password
  end

  def run
    user = User.authenticate(email, password)
    assert user, [:email, :not_valid]
  end
end

# And use them
outcome = LogIn.run(req.params)

if outcome.success?
  session[:user_id] = outcome.value.id
else
  outcome.input.password = nil # Don't leak it when rendering the form again
  render "auth/sign_in", errors: outcome.errors, form: outcome.input
end

Install

gem install writ

Validations

As with scrivener, you should define a validate method that defines all validations for the user input. You're also welcome to use validations inside of run, when an error can come from the process itself. The example above, where the email/password combination yields no user, is a good example. Another example would be having to make an API call that returns an error.

Take a look at the default validations that come from scrivener, or feel free to define custom ones to suit your domain.

Why

When using scrivener, I tend to add a run method to the objects to alter state based on user input alongside the validations. Some people like calling these objects "services", "use cases", "commands", or "interactions".

I find this useful to decouple complex actions from the actors involved in them, and to keep models "thin" by only caring about expressing the domain without burdening themselves with expressing how users can interact with the domain, or with concepts like validation and authorization.

After using this pattern in several production projects, I figured it might as well live in a gem I can reuse instead of copy-pasting code around.

License

This project is shared under the MIT license. See the attached LICENSE file for details.