8000 Files licensed CC-BY-SA-2.5 · Issue #88 · dominikh/go-js-dom · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
  • Files licensed CC-BY-SA-2.5 #88

    Open

    Description

    @fvcr

    Hi @dominikh,

    I'm trying to package the library for the Debian project but the v2/dom.go and dom.go files are under CC-BY-SA-2.5 and as the CC license in version 2.5 is not compatible with DFSG, I was wondering if you had any alternative to these two files?

    Activity

    1. dominikh commented on Feb 10, 2025

      @dominikh
      Owner

      Hi.

      The use of CC-BY-SA-2.5 in those files only pertains to docstrings/comments. Would it be feasible for you to strip them, or would that cause problems due to checksums?

      Also, is the problem with any CC-BY-SA, or just version 2.5? The MDN states that

      Unless otherwise indicated, the content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC-BY-SA), v2.5 or any later version.

      So we should be able to update

      go-js-dom/dom.go

      Lines 21 to 23 in 00dae51

      // The documentation for some of the identifiers is based on the
      // MDN Web Docs by Mozilla Contributors (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API),
      // licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.5 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/).
      to include "or any later version", too.

    2. fvcr commented on Feb 10, 2025

      @fvcr
      Author

      Thanks for the quick reply,

      CC license in version 4.0 is considered to be compatible to the DFSG.

      If you could make it clear that this is a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license, that would be great.

      Thanks!

    3. dominikh commented on Mar 4, 2025

      @dominikh
      Owner

      @fvcr I've updated the comments. This should be acceptable for you, right?

    4. fvcr commented on Mar 18, 2025

      @fvcr
      Author

      Hi @dominikh, sorry for the delay.

      What do you think about licensing it under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license?

    5. dominikh commented on Mar 18, 2025

      @dominikh
      Owner

      "CC-BY-SA 2.5 or later" subsumes "CC-BY-SA 4.0". I don't see why we'd have to make it stricter than necessary. You're free to call it CC-BY-SA 4.0 on your end.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      No labels
      No labels

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        0