Repository navigation
Name 158 more form properties, with their purposes from Microsoft's reference - #109
Merged
Merged
Conversation
- Name each unnamed ID up to 0x01C4 whose values are all held by one key, and no other, in the SaveAsText output of the five databases: 55 of text, 94 of numbers and Yes/No, and 9 of bytes - Name a Yes/No without a value (NotDefault) and a double, such as RecSrcDt, by number_prop_id_name, and bytes and GUIDs by the new bytes_prop_id_name - Agree NotDefault and numbers as one kind in the SaveAsText test, being the same Yes/No properties, and raise its floor of named IDs to 217 - Find by their names the properties the tests of jetdb-wasm and smoke.mjs found by number, and check that an unnamed ID is given by number with 0x0250 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…t's reference - Give the names of form-design (en/ja) in three tables, of text (95), number and Yes/No (114) and bytes (9) values, as the library names them - Take the purposes from the pages of form, report and control properties in Microsoft's Office VBA reference for Access (MicrosoftDocs/VBA-Docs, CC BY 4.0): the first English sentence, and the Japanese name in the Properties window or the first sentence of the Japanese page; mark the 32 keys the reference does not describe, adding only what was found of RecSrcDt and GUID - Tell how the names are chosen and where the purposes come from, and drop the three named IDs from the table of unknown IDs Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- The arms of match counted as branches, so prop_id_name, number_prop_id_name and bytes_prop_id_name went over the complexity thresholds with the names added, at 97, 116 and 11 - Keep the names in constant tables sorted by ID, TEXT_NAMES, NUMBER_NAMES and BYTES_NAMES, and look them up with name_in by binary search, so that each function is one line and more names add no complexity - Test that the tables are sorted by ID without repeats; the names stay the same Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
🤖 Generated with Claude Code