📝 Docs preview for commit fc0d42e at: https://608119d8a823d67771ce7ed7--modest-austin-48be4a.netlify.app

@FantasqueX I haven't taken a close look at the contributors-img. Is there some big difference between opencollective and contributors-img?

@FantasqueX I haven't taken a close look at the contributors-img. Is there some big difference between opencollective and contributors-img?

Since I don't have a repository with more than 100 stars, I can't use open collective. But from my observation of issues of open collective opencollective/opencollective-api#1164 and README.md of oi-wiki, the images generated by opencollective are outdated. And I can't find the sync frequency from the doc.

As for contributors-img explains caveats in the author's blog:

• A repo having too many contributors takes a long time to generate an image.
• For each repository, images are generated once in a day and it will be cached for later requests.

Here is an example of the author's repo https://github.com/angular/angular-ja , it works well.

I think the differences are as follows:

1. Sync frequency.
2. Open collective offers a lot of parameters while contributos-img doesn't.
3. Contributer-img provides larger width for each individual avatar.

@FantasqueX It seems good, but I find that the figure generated is not beautiful as well as opencollective. Besides, it is too large.

@iromise Surely, that's quite a problem :(

@iromise It's okay that the picture is not beautiful enough, as the correct result does mean to be more important than a look. We can just change to contributors-img temporarily, and find the one with better look in the future when we have spare time to do so.

Hi FantasqueX,

Thanks for your contributions! This plugin dose work well and I'm going to merge your pull request. This is just a notification message, and you don't need to take further actions to respond.

If you have any questions, or if you have further concerns, please feel free to contact us.

Best regards,
arttnba3
CTF-wiki team
04/10/2024