8000 Update sbt-typelevel-ci-release to 0.8.4 by scala-steward · Pull Request #42 · arainko/chanterelle · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Update sbt-typelevel-ci-release to 0.8.4 - #42

Merged
arainko merged 2 commits into
arainko:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/sbt-typelevel-ci-release-0.8.4
Dec 20, 2025
Merged

Update sbt-typelevel-ci-release to 0.8.4#42
arainko merged 2 commits into
arainko:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/sbt-typelevel-ci-release-0.8.4

Conversation

@scala-steward
@scala-steward scala-steward commented Dec 18, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

About this PR

📦 Updates org.typelevel:sbt-typelevel-ci-release from 0.8.3 to 0.8.4

📜 GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

Usage

✅ Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

⚙ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.typelevel", artifactId = "sbt-typelevel-ci-release" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.typelevel", artifactId = "sbt-typelevel-ci-release" }
}]
labels: sbt-plugin-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-patch, version-scheme:early-semver, commit-count:n:2

@arainko
arainko merged commit 376027f into arainko:main Dec 20, 2025
4 checks passed
@scala-steward
scala-steward deleted the update/sbt-typelevel-ci-release-0.8.4 branch February 22, 2026 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@scala-steward @arainko
0