8000 docs: record protected Comparator package evidence by Mnehmos · Pull Request #62 · Mnehmos/MathOS · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

docs: record protected Comparator package evidence - #62

Merged
Mnehmos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/60-protected-comparator-evidence
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

Mnehmos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/60-protected-comparator-evidence

Conversation

@Mnehmos
@Mnehmos Mnehmos commented Jul 22, 2026 •
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Tracks #60. This documentation closeout records the already-audited merged-tree artifact; issue #60 will be closed after this PR lands. ## Summary Records the exact-head, merged-tree, protected publication, GitHub artifact, and independent Comparator-package audit evidence for Phase 6d. It also advances the stated next priority from package readiness to real protected Comparator execution while preserving the explicit non-authority boundary. ## Change class - [x] Class 0: Administrative or documentation - [ ] Class 1: Standard implementation - [ ] Class 2: Verifier-critical - [ ] Class 3: Release, migration, or security-sensitive Affected trust boundary: documentation only; no executable contract, evidence, or authority state changes. ## TDD evidence - [x] Documentation-only exception applies and is explained below - [x] Relevant validation passes Red evidence: not applicable to a documentation-only evidence record. Green evidence: cargo fmt --all -- --check, git diff --check, and exact-head CI 29894036645 pass. The recorded implementation evidence passed exact-head CI 29893380402, merged-tree CI 29893579467, protected publication 29893579466, and independent offline artifact reprojection. ## Mathematical verification - [x] Candidate output was checked independently from its generator - [x] Formal proof passes the pinned kernel or checker - [x] Assumptions, domains, and dependency pins are recorded - [x] Artifact and theorem identifiers are linked Verifier and result: downloaded artifact 8519152437 reproduced the exact five-file package as verification beef8cd5d48d9cee07352f34366db5f34c77bc73b9c685b83ded490618960758; both Lean files elaborate, while status remains only ready with verification and authority false. ## Provenance and licensing - [x] No new third-party code, data, model output, or dependency - [x] No credentials, private data, or access-controlled material are included Provenance references: GitHub-retained artifact digest and exact fixed upstream repository/full-commit pins are recorded in the changed documents and #60 evidence comment. ## Risk and recovery Known limitations: real Linux Comparator execution, evidence ingestion, Pilot C, and full 1.0 acceptance remain open. Rollback or recovery plan: revert this documentation commit; implementation and retained artifact identities are unchanged. Follow-up work: implement the protected real-Comparator execution boundary, then continue BH Pilot C. ## Review readiness - [x] The branch is current with main - [x] The pull request addresses one coherent concern - [x] Required checks pass - [x] Review threads are resolved - [x] I have not represented package readiness as Comparator verification

@coderabbitai
coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 •
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Mnehmos, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 32 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1883c133-1a99-4f70-818f-fbca1e7b11d4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2fe5d00 and faa8347.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/implementation/RELEASE_CHECKLIST.md
  • docs/implementation/STATUS.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/60-protected-comparator-evidence

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Mnehmos
Mnehmos marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2026 05:31
@Mnehmos
Mnehmos merged commit 42e5a50 into main Jul 22, 2026
6 checks passed
@Mnehmos
Mnehmos deleted the docs/60-protected-comparator-evidence branch July 22, 2026 05:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

0