Repository navigation
Record controlled ingestion evidence - #35
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 4 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1303c1efba
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Summary
Records the exact merged-main evidence produced after PR #34 introduced controlled publication ingestion. The implementation ledger, release checklist, and trust-boundary document now identify the protected CI/publication runs, artifact, hashes, closed attestation bindings, and independent byte-audit result. They also remove the stale claim that merged-tree ingestion evidence is pending and promote the atomic authority gate to the next #21 priority.
Change class
Select one:
Affected trust boundary: no executable boundary changes. The documentation describes the existing boundary and preserves the distinction between provenance ingestion and mathematical authority.
TDD evidence
Red evidence: not applicable; this PR records evidence from the already-merged implementation.
Green evidence: PR #34 CI run
29720847015, main CI run29721420110, and protected publication run29721420136passed. The downloaded artifact audit recomputed all documented hashes and checked 71 retained files, 25 exact closure roles, eight empty stderr files, and 18 false authority fields.Commands and results:
git diff --checkpassed. Exact remote run, job, artifact, commit/tree, archive digest, and retained-object hashes are recorded in the changed documents and issue #21.Mathematical verification
Verifier and result: the exact protected candidate was challenged by pinned GitHub CLI 2.96.0 and then independently audited after download. Every retained authority field remains false; this is provenance evidence only.
Provenance and licensing
Provenance references: PR #34, issue #21, main CI run
29721420110, publication run29721420136, job88285050682, and artifact8452528096.Risk and recovery
Known limitations: the evidence remains non-authoritative and does not establish truth. The production verifier pin remains Linux-amd64 only.
Rollback or recovery plan: revert this documentation commit if any recorded identifier or hash is shown incorrect; do not delete the retained artifact or issue evidence.
Follow-up work: implement the atomic application gate that fully replays the current ingestion receipt and bound CAS closure before creating typed authoritative proof/refutation evidence.
Review readiness