8000 Record protected publication candidate evidence by Mnehmos · Pull Request #33 · Mnehmos/MathOS · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Record protected publication candidate evidence - #33

Merged
Mnehmos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/record-protected-candidate
Jul 20, 2026
Merged

Record protected publication candidate evidence#33
Mnehmos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/record-protected-candidate

Conversation

@Mnehmos
@Mnehmos Mnehmos commented Jul 20, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Outcome

Records the first exact merged protected publication candidate and advances issue #21's next step from artifact inspection to controlled ingestion.

The status entry preserves:

  • PR Produce protected publication candidates #31 merge and its retained protected-context failure
  • PR Fix protected runner context check #32's exact repair merge
  • green main CI and protected publication run identities
  • artifact/archive identity
  • request, 25-role closure, report, validator, and attempt identities
  • candidate Sigstore bundle, raw verifier, constrained verification, and Rekor timestamp identities
  • the independently checked no-import, pinned-dependency, no-axiom, execution, CAS, workflow, commit, ref, runner, and subject-digest controls
  • the explicit authoritative:false boundary

Validation

  • Every recorded identity was re-read from run 29716676599, artifact 8450846116, or the exact Git object API
  • All artifact assertions passed before this documentation change
  • git diff --check

Head: 1b11be3dcc7aabc2ec58ddd54ee887dae49dc866
Tree: 698176b6ce4057b865030727748904edaa395616

Non-goals

Documentation only. This PR does not ingest the candidate, create authority, or derive mathematical status.

Advances #21.

@Mnehmos
Mnehmos marked this pull request as ready for review July 20, 2026 04:28
@coderabbitai
coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026 •
edited
Loading
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Mnehmos, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 29 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: dd3e3b29-d38c-4abb-9474-1b747cc6f194

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc91164 and 1b11be3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/implementation/STATUS.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/record-protected-candidate

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Mnehmos
Mnehmos commented Jul 20, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Exact evidence-documentation head is ready:

  • CI run: https://github.com/Mnehmos/MathOS/actions/runs/29716970247
  • Head: 1b11be3dcc7aabc2ec58ddd54ee887dae49dc866
  • Tree: 698176b6ce4057b865030727748904edaa395616
  • All five required jobs passed
  • CodeRabbit completed with no review or inline findings
  • git diff --check passed
  • The PR changes only docs/implementation/STATUS.md

The recorded candidate remains authoritative:false; controlled ingestion is explicitly the next criterion.

@Mnehmos
Mnehmos merged commit b787935 into main Jul 20, 2026
6 checks passed
@Mnehmos
Mnehmos deleted the docs/record-protected-candidate branch July 20, 2026 04:31
@Mnehmos
Mnehmos commented Jul 20, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Canonical-main follow-up is green after the evidence record merged:

The exact first protected candidate evidence remains recorded in docs/implementation/STATUS.md. Issue #21 is not complete: controlled ingestion is now the next highest-priority criterion, followed by authoritative evidence creation and mathematical-status derivation.

This was referenced Jul 20, 2026
Closed
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Mnehmos
0