Repository navigation
Add reproducible benchmarks and documentation branding - #35
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Separate formulation, stored chemistry reference checks, and informational performance measurements. Record provenance, raw samples, and failed cases; add a manual CI workflow and reproduction protocol. Validation: 20 focused tests, strict Sphinx build, and wheel/sdist installation checks passed. Local baseline retains a near-dependent NNLS tolerance failure and an acid timing budget timeout; these are not hidden or treated as successful measurements.
This was referenced Oct 20, 2026
rafatahmed
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 20, 2026 09:45
This was referenced Oct 20, 2026
rafatahmed
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2026
Add reproducible benchmarks and documentation branding
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
FlahaX now has a versioned, reproducible benchmark protocol that separates formulation fit, stored-reference chemistry agreement, and performance measurements. Reports preserve provenance, raw samples, and failures; a manual CI workflow collects evidence without imposing speed thresholds or publishing results automatically.
The branch also integrates the approved FlahaX banners and transparent color/black/white logos into the README and Read the Docs theme, with asset-generation provenance.
Validation
Known limitations requiring review
This PR remains a draft so the retained numerical limitation and measurement budget can be reviewed before merge. Unrelated publication edits and unused branding alternatives are excluded.
Follow-up tracking
Benchmark limitations and subsequent validation work are tracked in #42, with individual issues #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, and #41. This PR does not close those follow-ups.
Historical branch naming clarification
The original source branch
codex/docs-brandingremains recorded here to preserve the audit history. Under the repository's current naming convention, the appropriate descriptive name isdocs/branding. This clarification does not rename the historical PR source branch or change any commits, hashes, merge records, reviews, or checks. Branch names are not authorship attribution. Future branches use purpose-based prefixes, withoutcodex/, and future commits must not add Codex co-author attribution.