Talk:Council Tax

Article created - see Lyons Inquiry Rik64 (talk) 19:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi who do I speak to about sorting my council tax debt out please Kyenewt (talk) 09:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Council Tax is unfair for it takes not into account the ability to pay. While the capital value of the property in which a person lives does give some indication of the relative wealth of the individual, it does not relate directly to income.

This problem is most acutely seen in pensioners for two reasons. First, they may have purchased their property many decades ago (certainly before the tax was introduced) and so its capital value today is only distantly attached to the price they paid for it. While an expensive property in 1960 is still likely to be expensive today (relatively speaking), some areas have seen greater or lesser growth over time. An example is perhaps a small worker's house in a rural area that had little value forty years ago, but today has a high desirabilty as a second home.

Next, the income of a pensioner today does not necessarily relate to their working income when a property was purchased. This is exacerbated by annual rises in the pension of only a few percent, while Council Tax rises may be as much as 15% per annum.

The tax is also terrible for renters, who must pay tax according to the value of a property they may not be able to afford, and may not wholly inhabit. The incomes of renters tend to be low, hence the need to rent instead of purchase, and so again the tax falls most heavily on those who cannot afford to pay.

A fairer situation would be to abolish the tax and apportion the money direct from central government finances, using a formula based on a per capita flat payment modified by the poverty or affluence of the area (poor people tend to use council services more). The argument against is that it removes independence from local governments, but in truth, over 75% of their income already comes from central budgets.

-- anon (195.92.168.176) - 8 December 2004

The discussion page is for discussing improvements to be made to the 'Council Tax' article. It's not actually intended as a place to fill with interesting related discussion (although there's no real harm in such discussion). Just wanted to clarify that because, one anonymous person wrote 'council tax is unfair.... discuss' (which was missleading) and then someone else responded by spending some time composing the above text. These points could actually be placed in the article itself, but only if they were reworded to be more neutral, e.g. "It is argued by some people, that council tax is unfair because...". But leaving interesting text on a discussion page, it will tend to go unnoticed (shame to waste the effort) -- Nojer2 00:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Added some of that in. Probably needs fleshing out more, particularly the pro-council-tax argument (I'm sure the government have made some statements in defense of it!) 136.2.1.101 11:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

--

There should be some discussion on council tax benefit which is a complicated system. There is a CAB statement from September 2005 on the need for council tax reform. Can be found at http://www.cas.org.uk/pressrelease892005.aspx

My friend told me that there's no council tax charged for January and February. But when I checked, I found I was being charged. I had not much luck googling on the topic. But this council website does indeed mention it, so I'm guessing it varies from council to council. Anyone know more about that? In fact here we don't mention paying monthly at all, but I guess that also varies (?). -- Nojer2 00:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Council tax is legally applied for the whole year in one go (falling due in April). Local councils can implement staged (monthly) payments (and I expect all do), but this is their own arrangement - many also have such 'payment holidays', although I thought that February and March were normally the months missed (last two of the council-tax year. If you miss a payment the council can only take enforcement action for the entire year's council tax, so you'd be taken to court for all the remaining months (and many would thereafter refuse to allow you to pay monthly). 136.2.1.101 10:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

In answer to Nojer2, it is common practice that an amendment is made to someone's liability (you move house, a discount is applied or withdrawn etc) the revised bill's payment schedule could be extended a month or so so that the council is able to give fair notice of the payment schedule (fourteen days). Rrsmac 23:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The ratio column is a bit unclear to people outside of England, I think...is that the amount owed, like 6 pounds per every 9 pounds the house is worth? 67% property tax sounds REALLY high to me, and 200% is preposterous, so I must be misinterpreting it. What does the ratio column mean? -- stillnotelf has a talk page 05:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hopefully I've made this clearer. The ratio governs the relationship between each band. 136.2.1.101 10:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I get that council tax rates are set by the council, but without giving the reader a rough idea about how much council tax is, it could just as well not exist.

Really, I'm going to be bold and put this right at the beginning of the article, where people can get a clear idea of how significant this tax is.

RandomP 19:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I was looking for a national figure for the number of properties in the England, Scotland and Wales, in each of the bands. It is not in the Wiki article and does not turn up on a search.

"Between the wholesale revaluations, a major change to a property (such as an extension, or some major blight causing loss of value) can trigger a revaluation to a new estimate of the value the property would have reached if sold in 1991. Newly constructed properties are also assigned a nominal 1991 value."

This isn't quite correct..in relation to property improvements eg an extension the valuation would only be reviewed once the dwelling was sold. Even then any increase in band and bill would only date from the date of sale so the previous owner wouldn't be liable.

It might not be totally clear, but it is correct. Is says 'improvement... CAN trigger a revaluation'. It also doesn't say revaluations would be retrospective.

Or to be more specific, it says changes cause revaluations. Blight causes a revaluation before a sale. You could try and change this, but it could easily get way too complex a sentance for a minor factor in the Council Tax system. 82.153.96.176

Hi Wikipedia team,

I would like to request the addition of an external site:

http://www.projectanalyser.co.uk

to the Council Tax page in Wikipedia.

I have been working closely with a relative to re-band a council tax band on new property as it was felt the band set was too high. I initially went on the web to find out information data to help support their case. I could not find too much information and felt we (the public) needed some help when it came to handling the appeals particular around obtaining evidence to support the claim.

To this end I put this website together. There are free tools to analyse the Council Tax Bands and also some supporting detail on how to tackle obtaining evidence towards an appeal against a Council Tax Band. There are other free tools within the site but the aim of the site was to provide some independent guidance on Council Tax and conducting Appeals.

Unfortunately we were unsuccessful in our appeal but we felt it important to pass on what we learned as we went on through the process.

Thanks for your help

Rberks 21:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Council tax and poll tax discussion forum at www.polltax.co.uk/counciltax/ is a practical forum where people discuss the real world issues of dealing with their responsibility to pay Council Tax

The references tag is used in one of the subsections for some notes on that sub-section. Anyone know how to separate notes and references?Winklethorpe 19:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've added a bit about how council tax is spent by quickly scanning through a variety of local council websites. I think it's important and highly relevant to include this information. The list I've put in is just a starter to give an idea of the sorts of things provided by councils and it should certainly be improved by others.

I'll be adding more content to Housing Benefit to expand on Council Tax Benefit, but I've already added the "Main page: Housing Benefit" link to this article. Just in case someone wonders why the HB page doesn't say much about council tax benefit! Sidasta 15:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

This article says Council tax is the main form of local taxation and goes on to say that it only contributes a small proportion of local government revenue. Can't be both... Stifle (talk) 09:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Most local government funding comes from grants from central government. Either general grants that the council can spend as they wish (which have been declining since the 1980s) or grants for a purpose specified by central government, that must be spent in the way dictated (on increase since 1980s and effectively making local authorities service delivery agents of the government). Council tax is still the main (only) form of local taxation. MRSC • Talk 09:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

You don't think Uniform Business Rates are a far larger source of income (even though the council only gets to keep half of the income) then? 86.140.67.152 (talk) 17:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The claim that large numbers of people appealed against their band as a result of the Tonight programme on January 2006 is not borne out by the Valuation Office Agency for 2006-07 which states "We have cleared some 28,000 appeals in England, broadly comparable with earlier years" (see page 23 of the 2006-07 Annual Report). Sam Blacketer (talk) 11:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Tonight programme was broadcast in 2007. There were a large number of enquiries from CT payers following this programme many of which were unable to submit a formal appeal as they were outside the statutory time limits. So even though there was no formal appeal these bandings were checked and amended if considered appropriate. These informal appeals are not included in the above figure.Lynx707 (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

As I recall from living a year in England, the council tax is levied on the occupant of a house, not on the owner. This distinguishes it from other property taxes, which are levied on the owner, not the occupant. The article should clarify this issue. I don't consider my personal recollection a reliable source and I'm not certain how this applies to the occupant of a flat (etc.) --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

i dont think enough is written about what the council tax is actually used to fund specifically. someone please expand on that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.56.148 (talk) 21:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Council Tax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928212158/http://www.lyonsinquiry.org.uk/index.php?leftbar=news&text=PN061206 to http://www.lyonsinquiry.org.uk/index.php?leftbar=news&text=PN061206
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091004190716/http://www.local.odpm.gov.uk:80/finance/ctax/cp078.htm to http://www.local.odpm.gov.uk/finance/ctax/cp078.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120307152955/http://www.itv.com/news/tonight_004ae25293cb8a3cc3a771af961dbcaa.html to http://www.itv.com/news/tonight_004ae25293cb8a3cc3a771af961dbcaa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Regarding today's announcement that the Scottish government proposes to increase the multipliers for bands E, F, G and H to 1.31, 1.63, 1.96 and 2.45 respectively. Anyone know if there is a reference to the actual values (i.e. are the new values defined as decimals, or are they defined as fractions with the decimal values in the press release just being approximations for convenience)?

(FWIW, just because it amused me to try and find a pattern in the figures, I figured out that the increases seem to follow a pattern of 11ths; band E: 11/9+1/11; band F: 13/9+2/11; band G: 15/9+3/11; band H: 18/9+5/11, but note this is just speculation on my part. Even though this _might_ be the origin of the multipliers, this would be original research unless a source attests to this)

Roybadami (talk) 12:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

I know council tax bands are assigned based on what the property would have been worth in 1991. But would it not be useful (if such information is available) to show what the current typical value of each of the bands are? Iapetus (talk) 13:08, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

It would be - I fear that it would be very difficult to do this however (unless there is an article specifically showing this) as the increase in property values has been very different across the nation. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 13:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Council Tax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151003042237/http://www.valuationtribunal.gov.uk/Libraries/CT_Manual/CT_Manual.sflb.ashx to http://www.valuationtribunal.gov.uk/Libraries/CT_Manual/CT_Manual.sflb.ashx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151003154544/http://www.valuationtribunal.gov.uk/Home.aspx to http://www.valuationtribunal.gov.uk/Home.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060717112101/http://www.axethetax.org.uk:80/ to http://www.axethetax.org.uk
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080624221925/http://www.local.odpm.gov.uk:80/finance/ctax/ctax089.htm to http://www.local.odpm.gov.uk/finance/ctax/ctax089.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Council Tax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150907195710/http://www.sthelens.gov.uk/what-we-do/benefits-and-council-tax/council-tax/discounts/ to http://www.sthelens.gov.uk/what-we-do/benefits-and-council-tax/council-tax/discounts/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100131061357/http://www.local.communities.gov.uk:80/finance/ctax/ctax0910.htm to http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/ctax/ctax0910.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151003154544/http://www.valuationtribunal.gov.uk/Home.aspx to http://www.valuationtribunal.gov.uk/Home.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060925235740/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/about/information/foi_disclosures/foi_counciltax_1991-2_2006.cfm to http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/about/information/foi_disclosures/foi_counciltax_1991-2_2006.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Council Tax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0%2C%2C2005300000-2007040164%2C00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151003154544/http://www.valuationtribunal.gov.uk/Home.aspx to http://www.valuationtribunal.gov.uk/Home.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Council Tax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151016212750/https://dwpexamination.wordpress.com/2015/07/29/council-tax-a-new-poll-tax-for-the-poor/ to https://dwpexamination.wordpress.com/2015/07/29/council-tax-a-new-poll-tax-for-the-poor/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100206133845/http://council-tax-rates.com/ to http://council-tax-rates.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Should this article have a section on the history of council tax, and how it replaced the poll tax?Vorbee (talk) 10:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Anhdark (talk) 13:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there I got one question to ask please. Anhdark (talk) 13:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply