[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Template talk:Disability navbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

High importance and Mid importance are not good classifications and would be high maintenance. Suggest better ones, thanks. Hordaland (talk) 14:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Importance is not a good way to sort them - I think we could use "themes" such as:
Rights and law - (Articles about UN conventions, ADA, etc.)
Social issues - (Articles about Inclusion, Special education, Sport, etc.)
Medical issues - (Articles about Diseases and conditions that lead to disability)
Technology - (Articles about wheelchairs, hearing aids, etc.)
and so on. Roger (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]