This topic describes how to lint, or validate, your Identity and Access Management (IAM) allow policies.
Before you begin
- Enable the IAM API. - Roles required to enable APIs - To enable APIs, you need the Service Usage Admin IAM role ( - roles/serviceusage.serviceUsageAdmin), which contains the- serviceusage.services.enablepermission. Learn how to grant roles.
- Read the IAM Conditions overview to understand the basics of IAM Conditions. 
Required roles
To lint a resource's allow policy, you need permissions to get the resource, and
to get and set the allow policy for the resource. These permissions have the
following form, where SERVICE is the name of the service
that owns the resource and RESOURCE_TYPE is the name of
the resource type that you want to manage access to:
- SERVICE.RESOURCE_TYPE.get
- SERVICE.RESOURCE_TYPE.getIamPolicy
- SERVICE.RESOURCE_TYPE.setIamPolicy
For example, to lint a project's allow policy, you need the following permissions:
- resourcemanager.projects.get
- resourcemanager.projects.getIamPolicy
- resourcemanager.projects.setIamPolicy
To gain the required permissions, ask your administrator to grant you a
predefined or custom role that includes the permissions. For example, your
administrator could grant you the Security Admin role
(roles/iam.securityAdmin), which includes permissions to get almost all
Google Cloud resources and manage their allow policies.
Understanding linting for allow policies
In the context of allow policies, linting is a method of examining a new or existing allow policy and checking it for specific issues. These issues include the following range of possibilities:
- Suggestions
- Warnings
- Information that can help improve the intent of the allow policy, such as better syntax and semantics
- Syntax or semantic errors that cause setIamPolicyoperations to fail
If you try to update an allow policy, and you get an error, linting the allow policy can help you find the cause of the error. You can also use the linter to help ensure that a conditional role binding has the intended effect.
Linting a condition
Condition expressions can be complex, especially in scenarios that require multiple clauses and logic operators to appropriately manage access. If a condition expression contains invalid logic, or if the syntax violates the restrictions of a condition expression, you cannot add the condition to an allow policy.
Also, even if a condition expression uses the correct syntax, it might contain semantic errors, which can prevent your allow policies and role bindings from working as expected. Common semantic errors include the following:
- Use of unrecommended functions
- Use of legacy resource types or legacy service names
- Ineffective conditions, such as an inapplicable date or time range
When you lint a condition, the linter inspects the condition expression and reports any syntax errors. It also reports possible semantic errors that could cause unexpected results.
Before attempting to set a new conditional role binding, you are encouraged to lint the expression first. This section shows you how to lint a condition expression using the Google Cloud console, Google Cloud CLI, or the REST API.
To lint a condition expression:
Console
- In the Google Cloud console, go to the IAM page. 
- Click Select a project, choose a project, and click Open. 
- From the list of principals, locate the desired principal and click the Edit button. 
- From the Edit permissions panel, locate the desired role that you want to lint. Then under IAM condition (optional), click the name of the condition. 
- In the Condition editor, manually add or edit a condition expression. 
- To validate the CEL syntax, click Run Linter. - If the syntax contains errors, an Error icon appears next to the incorrect line. To see details about each error, hold the pointer over the icon. - If the condition uses the correct syntax, but the linter finds a possible issue, a Warning icon appears next to the line with the issue. To see details about each warning, hold the pointer over the icon. 
- Make any necessary changes to the condition expression. After you click Run Linter, the linter runs automatically in the background while you edit the expression. - You must correct all errors before you save the condition expression. We strongly encourage you to fix all warnings as well. 
- When there are no errors or warnings, click Save to apply the condition. 
- Once the Edit condition panel is closed, click Save again from the Edit permissions panel to update your allow policy. 
gcloud
Execute the
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition
command to lint a given condition expression. To execute this command, you
can either create a text file that contains the condition, or specify
flags for the condition's title, description, and expression.
The following example uses a text file that contains the following condition:
condition.json
{
  "title": "1_less_than_2",
  "description": "",
  "expression": "1 <"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
The output from the command contains the following:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: |-
    ERROR: Parse expression:1:3: mismatched input '<EOF>' expecting {'[', '{', '(', '.', '-', '!', 'true', 'false', 'null', NUM_FLOAT, NUM_INT, NUM_UINT, STRING, BYTES, IDENTIFIER}
      | 1 >
      | ...^
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 3
  severity: ERROR
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/ConditionCompileCheck
...
Each of the lint results contain a debugMessage that can be used to help
locate the problem with the condition expression. If the condition failed to
compile, you may see many different validationUnitName types with the
following debugMessage text:
The validation unit is skipped due to absence of a required object: CheckedExpr
Make changes so that the expression compiles, then lint the condition again.
REST
  The 
  iamPolicies.lintPolicy
  
  method lints, or validates, a condition expression in an allow policy.
Before using any of the request data, make the following replacements:
- 
    condition: AnExprobject representing the condition to lint. For example:"title": "1_less_than_2", "description": "", "expression": "1 <" To learn about the format of an Exprobject, see theExprschema reference.
HTTP method and URL:
POST https://iam.googleapis.com/v1/iamPolicies:lintPolicy
Request JSON body:
{
  "condition": {
    condition
  }
}
To send your request, expand one of these options:
  The response body contains one or more
  LintResult
  objects, such as the following:
{
  "lint_results": {
    "level": "CONDITION",
    "validation_unit_name": "LintValidationUnits/ConditionCompileCheck",
    "severity": "ERROR",
    "field_name": "condition.expression",
    "location_offset": "2",
    "debug_message": "ERROR: Parse expression:1:2: mismatched input \'<EOF>\' expecting {\'[\', \'{\', \'(\', \'.\', \'-\', \'!\', \'true\', \'false\', \'null\', NUM_FLOAT, NUM_INT, NUM_UINT, STRING, BYTES, IDENTIFIER}\n  | 1<\n  | ..^"
  },
  "lint_results": {
    "level": "CONDITION",
    "validation_unit_name": "LintValidationUnits/ConditionComplexityCheck",
    "severity": "NOTICE",
    "field_name": "condition.expression",
    "debug_message": "The validation unit is skipped due to absence of a required object: CheckedExpr"
  }
}
Each of the lint results contain a debug_message that can be used to help
locate the problem with the condition expression. If the condition failed to
compile, you may see many different validation_unit_name types with
the following debugMessage text:
The validation unit is skipped due to absence of a required object: CheckedExpr
Make changes so that the expression compiles, then lint the condition again.
Supported validation units
As described previously, a validation unit is an individual lint type that evaluates the expression for syntactic issues. The table below summarizes supported validation units, each with intended linting level, linting result severity, and a brief description.
| Validation unit | Lint level | Severity | Description | 
|---|---|---|---|
| ConditionCompileCheck | CONDITION | ERROR | The condition expression contains a compilation error as a result of invalid CEL syntax. | 
| ConditionComplexityCheck | CONDITION | ERROR | The condition expression contains more than the maximum of 12 logic operators. | 
| DateTimeCheck | CONDITION | WARNING | The condition expression specifies a timestamp comparison that always evaluates to either true or false, due to one of these issues: 
 | 
| DateTimeRangeCheck | CONDITION | WARNING | Value out of range for the intended advanced timestamp function and the comparison expression. See the valid values for advanced timestamp functions. | 
| DrgGetAttributeDefaultValueCheck | CONDITION | ERROR | The condition expression calls api.getAttribute('iam.googleapis.com/modifiedGrantsByRole', V),
      whereVis any value other than an empty list,[]. For this API attribute,Vmust
      always be an empty list. | 
| EffectiveTimeRangeCheck | CONDITION | WARNING | In a more complex usage of timestamp functions and comparison, the expression results in an empty effective time range, and is therefore effectively false. Alternatively, the time range covers a full range, and is therefore effectively true. | 
| HasOnlyListConstCheck | CONDITION | ERROR | The condition expression calls hasOnly(List<T>), where
      the typeTis not a constant type, such as a string or
      integer. ThehasOnly()function accepts only a list of
      constants. | 
| HasOnlyListLengthCheck | CONDITION | ERROR | The condition expression calls hasOnly(List<T>), andList<T>contains more than the maximum of
      10 elements. | 
| ResourceServiceLiteralCheck | CONDITION | WARNING | The specified resource.servicevalue is not supported. The
      expression using such string literal for equality comparison is
      effectively false. Use a
      supported
        value. | 
| ResourceTypeLiteralCheck | CONDITION | WARNING | The specified resource.typevalue is not supported.
      The expression using such string literal for equality comparison is
      effectively false. Use a
      supported
        value. | 
| RestrictedAttributesCheck | CONDITION | WARNING | The expression uses an attribute that is restricted or not supported. Setting the condition expression might not succeed. See the list of attributes. | 
Linting examples
This section shows examples of conditions that cause each validation unit to report issues. Each example demonstrates linting by using the Google Cloud CLI.
No validation issues
Example condition:
{
  "title": "1_less_than_2",
  "description": "",
  "expression": "1 < 2"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
{}
ConditionCompileCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "Condition not compiling",
  "description": "",
  "expression": "true=false"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: |-
    ERROR: Parse expression:1:4: token recognition error at: '=f'
      | true=false
      | ....^
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 4
  severity: ERROR
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/ConditionCompileCheck
ConditionComplexityCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "Condition not compiling",
  "description": "",
  "expression":
    "1<2 || 2<3 || 3<4 || 4<5 || 5<6 || 6<7 || 7<8 || 8<9 || 9<10 || 10<11 || 11<12 || 12<13 || 13<14 || 14<15"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: Logical operators count must not be more than 12
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  severity: ERROR
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/ConditionComplexityCheck
DateTimeCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "Condition not compiling",
  "description": "",
  "expression": "request.time < timestamp('2000-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: Ineffective date time value 2000-01-01T00:00:00+00:00 parsed
    from "2000-01-01T00:00:00Z"; condition is effectively False. Time expired
    already.
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 25
  severity: WARNING
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/DateTimeCheck
DateTimeRangeCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "Time function out of range",
  "description": "",
  "expression": "request.time.getMonth() > 13"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: The value being compared to the specified timestamp function
    (getMonth) must be in range [0, 11].
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 26
  severity: WARNING
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/DateTimeRangeCheck
DrgGetAttributeDefaultValueCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "DRG condition takes non empty list as default value",
  "description": "",
  "expression":
    "api.getAttribute('iam.googleapis.com/modifiedGrantsByRole', ['roles/viewer']).hasOnly(['roles/editor'])"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: api.getAttribute call on
    'iam.googleapis.com/modifiedGrantsByRole' can only
    accept empty list ('[]') as default value.
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 60
  severity: ERROR
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/DrgGetAttributeDefaultValueCheck
EffectiveTimeRangeCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "Empty time range",
  "description": "",
  "expression": "request.time.getMonth() > 5 && request.time.getMonth() < 4"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: The aggregate of time functions [getMonth] results in empty ranges.
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  severity: WARNING
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/EffectiveTimeRangeCheck
HasOnlyListConstCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "hasOnly contains more than constant value",
  "description": "",
  "expression":
    "api.getAttribute('somekey', []).hasOnly(['somevalue', resource.name])"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: hasOnly() expects an argument of type list containing only const
      values, but a non-const expression was found in the list.
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 59
  severity: ERROR
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/HasOnlyListConstCheck
HasOnlyListLengthCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "hasOnly contains more than 10 elements",
  "description": "",
  "expression":
    "api.getAttribute('somekey', []).hasOnly([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11])"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: The list argument to hasOnly() cannot have more than 10 elements
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 39
  severity: ERROR
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/HasOnlyListLengthCheck
ResourceServiceLiteralCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "Condition with unsupported resource service string",
  "description": "",
  "expression": "resource.service == 'resourcemanager'"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: 'resource.service : resourcemanager is not supported. Using this
    value in condition may lead to unintended consequences. Check user guide at
    https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/conditions-resource-attributes#resource_service_values
    for supported values for resource.service.'
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 20
  severity: WARNING
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/ResourceServiceLiteralCheck
ResourceTypeLiteralCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "Condition with legacy resource type",
  "description": "",
  "expression": "resource.type == 'resourcemanager.projects'"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: 'resource.type : resourcemanager.projects is not supported.
    Using this value in condition may lead to unintended consequences. Check
    user guide at https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/conditions-resource-attributes#resource_type_values
    for supported values for resource.type.'
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 17
  severity: WARNING
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/ResourceTypeLiteralCheck
RestrictedAttributesCheck
Example condition:
{
  "title": "Condition with restricted attribute",
  "description": "",
  "expression": "'accessPolicies/123/accesslevels/TRUSTED' in request.auth.access_levels"
}
Run command:
gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition --condition-from-file="condition.json"
Lint result:
lintResults:
- debugMessage: Condition attribute `request.auth.access_levels` is restricted
    or unsupported. Please check https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/conditions-overview
    for the full list of supported attributes
  fieldName: condition.expression
  level: CONDITION
  locationOffset: 57
  severity: WARNING
  validationUnitName: LintValidationUnits/RestrictedAttributesCheck