Repository navigation
Fix link broken in downstream #53563
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
andymunro
wants to merge
1
commit into
keycloak:main
Choose a base branch
from
andymunro:53562
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think the X.509 section should have the separate attribute record as it's not any special. We should have the same problem with the
_vault-key-resolvers, and_client_policiesIDs, as they also use the underscore as a prefix.So for now, I'd suggest using the auxiliary anchor (if feasible) to support both and be able to backport it:
For the main, it'd be good to restrict using the anchors with an underscore prefix -> so, we'd need to find all references in guides + add some compile checks for the docs. Should be handled in a follow-up issue.
@andymunro WDYT? Could you please also fix the other references?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have not used Auxillary anchors before, but I can see how it works. @ahus1 do you agree with this idea? In the next release, downstream will be in a completely separate repository. So I would not invest a lot of time with this issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Considering we're using the
:adminguide_vault: {adminguide_link}#_vault-key-resolversalready in the attributes, I'm ok to go with this change (and maybe also add the attribute for the _client_policies).And for the Keycloak 27, we can provide some better approach.
@andymunro WDYT? So, can you resolve the conflict?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I will defer to @ahus1 who has a lot more insight in what works best with this change.