Atera has 6 pricing edition(s), from $129 to $219. A free trial of Atera is also available. Look at different pricing editions below and read more information about the product here to see which one is right for you.
Unlimited devices.
For the latest information on pricing, visit the official pricing page
30-day free trial. No credit card required.
Other pricing plans from leading alternatives in this category.
| Feature | Free Version | Paid Version |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Available | Available |
| Available | Available | |
| Forum/Community | Available | Available |
| FAQ/Knowledgebase | Available | Available |
| Social Media | Available | Available |
| Video Tutorials / Webinar | Available | Available |
Atera’s pricing model is based on per technician rather than per endpoint, making it cost-effective for smaller teams managing … track of hardware and software used during tickets and is easy to adjust pricing in case someone needs to quote or invoice something. the ai feature has … endpoints across severa…
patches quicker turn around times on tickets for issues savings on the pricing model (technician based instead of endpoint) … I think Atera is the leader here. The aggressive pricing along with feature set is unparalleled in my opinion. They seem to be headed
agent pricing. Poor billing of third party integrations apps. … Atera is a mid-range solution for its pricing. If it continues to increase in price and keeps … Overall, the basic agent cost is better for a partially functional product.
mobile and tablets could be better Integration with third party software Pricing could be less steep … I think the steep pricing just isn't worth it. … Greater customer retention Customer satisfaction because of easier debugging Cheaper than an employee
We have been able to implement processes and SLAs at pricing that suits our different clients. … N-able MSP Manager (formerly Solarwinds MSP Manager) was more expensive than Atera
management (which is a bit iffy) and remote access (no issues there). The pricing is absolutely great because it's per technician and not per device, which … Atera is very similar to Syncro in feature set and pricing, but we liked Atera just a bit better. (We switched from Atera to Syncro … would improve once we'd signe…
service from helpdesk ticketing to end point monitoring. It was the best cost effective option since you pay per seat and not by end point. As a bonus … orgs not wanting to eat the cost for multi lice…
Cost per machine is low Cost per technician allows us to grow without adding additional costs
hassle-free and integrates with some amazing third-party tools at decent pricing, you should definitely go forward with Atera. However, the tool does have … for which we would have had to subscribe to at least 2-3 tools at higher pricing than what Atera was offering. Also,…
Atera reduces the need for multiple software solutions, reducing the overall cost of licensing and ownership.
and maintenance, cost management and remote access for support. In short, Atera provides the tools needed for efficient IT management, cost reduction, and … IT Automation, Ticketing System for our IT support. It has increased our cost efficiency significantly. Our security and compliance were also benefited … As far as…
Atera provides great value and with it's low cost pricing strategy, which costs for each technician, companies with … solution that streamlines IT services and provides good performance and it charges depending on the technician, hence this is the most rationale choice.
home. Best for providing support to clients. Has ticket raising features and cost-effective … Easy setup and learning best for beginners. Takes less cost than other tools in the market. Automation is time-saving. Scalability can
Ateras pricing strategy of per technician instead of per device is always a big factor
End-user service options will minimize intervention. Pricing could be made more affordable. More differentiated service options should be available … good package and can have more pricing options with s…
subscription fees. … I would like to see their pricing tiers done differently … differently. It's a high price for any SSO integration that would benefit smaller customers. Support Portal for end users customization More options for
to any problem that may arise. I think Atera is much more cost-effective and reliable; its value is justified with each function and satisfies all our business
All-in-one platforms reduce overall IT software cost IT automation for software updates and patch management Faster onboarding … platform that optimized IT processes and reduced costs. This tool has reduced cost of ownership and improved team. … Comparison from…
processes and automate them, for small companies, it could be somewhat expensive, so it is needed to make a budget analysis … automatization and gave us many benefits regarding time saving and simplicity. The cost savings and enhanced user experience are worth to mention also,…
features you have or were told you'd have to suddenly be moved up to a more expensive tier. I think Patch Management is a joke and terrible compared to other … In my experience, Atera lured us in with the pricing per technician to try and save us money. They then proceeded…
was easy to get up and running. Atera is the only RMM that is priced by technician and price is a big concern when you work for a non-profit. I'm not sure
Atera is way more user friendly , it has a smooth learning curve and the pricing is favorable. Atera also has a lot of features that make it superior. They
full monitoring, patch management & remote access features at an affordable price. Less Recommendation for large enterprises with huge IT infrastructures … management tools into Atera resulted in annual cost savings of nearby 5K$ to 9k$ due to reduced licensing fees and…
pay-per-technician pricing just made sense for us. They don't nickel-and-dime either. NinjaOne, by contrast, was over twice as expensive to start out, but … services that separately did some of the features of Atera, but combined costed nearly twice what Atera itself costs for one technician. So, in this aspect &…