| Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits MD Jennions, M Petrie Biological Reviews 75 (1), 21-64, 2000 | 2225 | 2000 |
| Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences MD Jennions, M Petrie Biological Reviews 72 (2), 283-327, 1997 | 1721 | 1997 |
| The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science ML Head, L Holman, R Lanfear, AT Kahn, MD Jennions PLoS biology 13 (3), e1002106, 2015 | 1714 | 2015 |
| Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta‐analysis AM Davidson, M Jennions, AB Nicotra Ecology letters 14 (4), 419-431, 2011 | 1526 | 2011 |
| Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios H Kokko, MD Jennions Journal of evolutionary biology 21 (4), 919-948, 2008 | 1356 | 2008 |
| The evolution of mate choice and mating biases H Kokko, R Brooks, MD Jennions, J Morley Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences …, 2003 | 1110 | 2003 |
| Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension RE O'Dea, M Lagisz, MD Jennions, J Koricheva, DWA Noble, TH Parker, ... Biological Reviews 96 (5), 1695-1722, 2021 | 644 | 2021 |
| Unifying and testing models of sexual selection H Kokko, MD Jennions, R Brooks Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37 (1), 43-66, 2006 | 635 | 2006 |
| How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists? A Møller, MD Jennions Oecologia 132 (4), 492-500, 2002 | 584 | 2002 |
| High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young J Hunt, R Brooks, MD Jennions, MJ Smith, CL Bentsen, LF Bussiere Nature 432 (7020), 1024-1027, 2004 | 581 | 2004 |
| The h index and career assessment by numbers CD Kelly, MD Jennions Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21 (4), 167-170, 2006 | 537 | 2006 |
| Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta‐analysis RA Slatyer, BS Mautz, PRY Backwell, MD Jennions Biological Reviews 87 (1), 1-33, 2012 | 500 | 2012 |
| Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis MD Jennions, AP Moller, M Petrie The Quarterly Review of Biology 76 (1), 3-36, 2001 | 477 | 2001 |
| Testing and adjusting for publication bias AP Møller, MD Jennions Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16 (10), 580-586, 2001 | 471 | 2001 |
| What is genetic quality? J Hunt, LF Bussiere, MD Jennions, R Brooks Trends in ecology & evolution 19 (6), 329-333, 2004 | 449 | 2004 |
| The mismeasurement of sexual selection H Klug, J Heuschele, MD Jennions, H Kokko Journal of evolutionary biology 23 (3), 447-462, 2010 | 419 | 2010 |
| Methods for testing publication bias in ecological and evolutionary meta‐analyses S Nakagawa, M Lagisz, MD Jennions, J Koricheva, DWA Noble, ... Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13 (1), 4-21, 2022 | 384 | 2022 |
| Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta‐analyses of strategic ejaculation CD Kelly, MD Jennions Biological Reviews 86 (4), 863-884, 2011 | 379 | 2011 |
| How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? A Møller, M Jennions Naturwissenschaften 88 (10), 401-415, 2001 | 379 | 2001 |
| The many costs of sex J Lehtonen, MD Jennions, H Kokko Trends in ecology & evolution 27 (3), 172-178, 2012 | 362 | 2012 |
Pat BackwellEvolution, Ecology & Genetics - Australian National UniversityVerified email at anu.edu.au
