| Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk C Starmer Journal of economic literature 38 (2), 332-382, 2000 | 2747 | 2000 |
| The nature of salience: An experimental investigation of pure coordination games J Mehta, C Starmer, R Sugden The American Economic Review 84 (3), 658-673, 1994 | 812 | 1994 |
| Experimental economics: Rethinking the rules P Moffatt, C Starmer, R Sugden, N Bardsley, R Cubitt, G Loomes Princeton University Press, 2009 | 657 | 2009 |
| Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation C Starmer, R Sugden The American Economic Review 81 (4), 971-978, 1991 | 600 | 1991 |
| A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences I Bateman, A Munro, B Rhodes, C Starmer, R Sugden The quarterly journal of economics 112 (2), 479-505, 1997 | 573 | 1997 |
| Measuring the closeness of relationships: a comprehensive evaluation of the'inclusion of the other in the self'scale S Gächter, C Starmer, F Tufano PloS one 10 (6), e0129478, 2015 | 505 | 2015 |
| On the validity of the random lottery incentive system RP Cubitt, C Starmer, R Sugden Experimental Economics 1 (2), 115-131, 1998 | 482 | 1998 |
| Observing violations of transitivity by experimental methods G Loomes, C Starmer, R Sugden Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 425-439, 1991 | 397 | 1991 |
| Third-generation prospect theory U Schmidt, C Starmer, R Sugden Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36 (3), 203-223, 2008 | 380 | 2008 |
| Focal points in pure coordination games: An experimental investigation J Mehta, C Starmer, R Sugden Theory and Decision 36 (2), 163-185, 1994 | 323 | 1994 |
| Explaining Focal Points: Cognitive Hierarchy Theory versus Team Reasoning N Bardsley, J Mehta, C Starmer, R Sugden The Economic Journal 120 (543), 40-79, 2010 | 314 | 2010 |
| Testing for juxtaposition and event-splitting effects C Starmer, R Sugden Journal of risk and uncertainty 6 (3), 235-254, 1993 | 309 | 1993 |
| Does part–whole bias exist? An experimental investigation I Bateman, A Munro, B Rhodes, C Starmer, R Sugden The Economic Journal 107 (441), 322-332, 1997 | 264 | 1997 |
| Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration I Bateman, D Kahneman, A Munro, C Starmer, R Sugden Journal of Public Economics 89 (8), 1561-1580, 2005 | 242 | 2005 |
| Preference anomalies, preference elicitation and the discovered preference hypothesis J Braga, C Starmer Environmental and Resource Economics 32 (1), 55-89, 2005 | 240 | 2005 |
| Violations of the independence axion in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses C Starmer, R Sugden Annals of Operations Research 19 (1), 79-102, 1989 | 212 | 1989 |
| Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experiment S Gächter, H Orzen, E Renner, C Starmer Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 70 (3), 443-446, 2009 | 208 | 2009 |
| Do anomalies disappear in repeated markets? G Loomes, C Starmer, R Sugden The Economic Journal 113 (486), C153-C166, 2003 | 190 | 2003 |
| Experimental economics and deception: A comment T McDaniel, C Starmer Journal of Economic Psychology 19 (3), 403-409, 1998 | 184 | 1998 |
| Dynamic choice and the common ratio effect: An experimental investigation R Cubitt, C Starmer, R Sugden The Economic Journal 108 (450), 1362-1380, 1998 | 173 | 1998 |
Robert SugdenProfessor of Economics, University of East AngliaVerified email at uea.ac.uk
