| Toward another view of legal negotiation: The structure of problem solving C Menkel-Meadow Ucla L. Rev. 31, 754, 1983 | 1316 | 1983 |
| Portia in a different voice: Speculations on a women's lawyering process C Menkel-Meadow Berkeley Women's LJ 1, 39, 1985 | 907 | 1985 |
| Whose dispute is it anyway?: a philosophical and democratic defense of settlement (in some cases) C Menkel-Meadow Mediation, 39-72, 2018 | 616 | 2018 |
| The trouble with the adversary system in a postmodern, multicultural world C Menkel-Meadow Mediation, 633-672, 2018 | 607 | 2018 |
| Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: a Tale of Innovation Co-opted or the Law of ADR C Menkel-Meadow Fla. St. UL Rev. 19, 1, 1991 | 538 | 1991 |
| Feminist legal theory, critical legal studies, and legal education or the fem-crits go to law school C Menkel-Meadow J. Legal Educ. 38, 61, 1988 | 447 | 1988 |
| For and against settlement: Uses and abuses of the mandatory settlement conference C Menkel-Meadow Ucla L. Rev. 33, 485, 1985 | 439 | 1985 |
| Restorative justice: What is it and does it work? C Menkel-Meadow Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3 (1), 161-187, 2007 | 391 | 2007 |
| The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research P Cane, H Kritzer OUP Oxford, 2012 | 381 | 2012 |
| Ethics in alternative dispute resolution: New issues, no answers from the adversary conception of lawyers’ responsibilities C Menkel-Meadow Mediation, 429-476, 2018 | 335 | 2018 |
| Feminist discourse, moral values, and the law--A conversation EC DuBois, MC Dunlap, CJ Gilligan, CA MacKinnon, CJ Menkel-Meadow BuFF. l. rev. 34, 11, 1985 | 282 | 1985 |
| Excluded voices: New voices in the legal profession making new voices in the law C Menkel-Meadow U. Miami L. Rev. 42, 29, 1987 | 265 | 1987 |
| Do the haves come out ahead in alternative judicial systems: repeat players in ADR C Menkel-Meadow Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 15, 19, 1999 | 248 | 1999 |
| Narrowing the Gap by Narrowing the Field: What's Missing from the MacCrate Report--Of Skills, Legal Science and Being a Human Being C Menkel-Meadow Wash. L. Rev. 69, 593, 1994 | 248 | 1994 |
| Exploring a research agenda of the feminization of the legal profession: Theories of gender and social change C Menkel-Meadow Law & Social Inquiry 14 (2), 289-319, 1989 | 245 | 1989 |
| Mothers and fathers of invention: The intellectual founders of ADR C Menkel-Meadow Ohio St. J. Disp. Resol. 16, 1, 2000 | 235 | 2000 |
| Aha--is creativity possible in problem solving and teachable in legal education C Menkel-Meadow Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 6, 97, 2001 | 221 | 2001 |
| When dispute resolution begets disputes of its own: conflicts among dispute professionals C Menkel-Meadow Ucla L. Rev. 44, 1871, 1996 | 212 | 1996 |
| The many ways of mediation: The transformation of traditions, ideologies, paradigms, and practices C Menkel-Meadow Negotiation Journal 11 (3), 217-242, 1995 | 208 | 1995 |
| The lawyer’s role (s) in deliberative democracy C Menkel-Meadow Multi-Party Dispute Resolution, Democracy and Decision-Making, 349-371, 2017 | 184 | 2017 |
