| She’s hot, for a politician: The impact of objectifying commentary on perceived credibility of female candidates ME Funk, CR Coker Communication Studies 67 (4), 455-473, 2016 | 59 | 2016 |
| Tweeting presidential primary debates: Debate processing through motivated Twitter instruction FJ Jennings, CR Coker, MS McKinney, BR Warner American Behavioral Scientist 61 (4), 455-474, 2017 | 33 | 2017 |
| Which ingroup, when? Effects of gender, partisanship, veteran status, and evaluator identities on candidate evaluations MM Hardy, CR Coker, ME Funk, BR Warner Communication Quarterly 67 (2), 199-220, 2019 | 21 | 2019 |
| From exemptions to censorship: religious liberty and victimhood in Obergefell v. Hodges CR Coker Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15 (1), 35-52, 2018 | 21 | 2018 |
| Comic agonism in the 2016 campaign: A study of Iowa Caucus rallies BR Warner, R Galarza, CR Coker, P Tschirhart, S Hoeun, FJ Jennings, ... American Behavioral Scientist 63 (7), 836-855, 2019 | 20 | 2019 |
| A multimedia analysis of persuasion in the 2016 presidential election: Comparing the unique and complementary effects of political comedy and political advertising BR Warner, FJ Jennings, JC Bramlett, CR Coker, JL Reed, JP Bolton Mass Communication and Society 21 (6), 720-741, 2018 | 17 | 2018 |
| The political is personal: Analyzing the presidential primary debate performances of Hillary Clinton and Michele Bachmann MM Greenwood, CR Coker Argumentation and Advocacy 52 (3), 165-180, 2016 | 15 | 2016 |
| ‘I just don’t think she has a presidential look:’the influence of sexism on candidate image FJ Jennings, CR Coker Information, Communication & Society 23 (9), 1353-1367, 2020 | 14 | 2020 |
| Absurdity in the statehouse: Burlesque legislation and the politics of rejection CR Coker Communication Quarterly 68 (1), 94-113, 2020 | 13 | 2020 |
| Murder, miscarriage, and women’s choice: Prudence in the Colorado personhood debate CR Coker Western Journal of Communication 81 (3), 300-319, 2017 | 13 | 2017 |
| Harriet Tubman, women on 20s, and intersectionality: Public memory and the redesign of US currency CR Coker Southern Communication Journal 82 (4), 239-249, 2017 | 11 | 2017 |
| Recasting the founding fathers: The Tea Party movement, neoliberalism, and American myth C Coker Speaker & Gavel 54 (1), 3, 2017 | 7 | 2017 |
| “Do you think this isn’t happening?” Rhetorical laundering and the federal hearings over Planned Parenthood C Coker Women & Language 46 (1), 225-254, 2023 | 6 | 2023 |
| Romney, Obama, and the 47%: gaffes and representative anecdotes in the 2012 presidential campaign C Coker Argumentation and Advocacy 53 (4), 327-343, 2017 | 6 | 2017 |
| A handmaid’s tale: Amy Coney Barrett, originalism, and the specter of religion CR Coker, JL Reed Communication and Democracy 57 (2), 153-177, 2023 | 5 | 2023 |
| Replacing notorious: Barret, Ginsburg, and postfeminist positioning CR Coker Rhetoric and Public Affairs 26 (1), 101-130, 2023 | 5 | 2023 |
| “This is a patriotism check”: Political economy, corruption, and duty to America in the 2020 primary debates CR Coker, JL Reed Argumentation and Advocacy 57 (3-4), 200-217, 2021 | 5 | 2021 |
| On (not) seeing the chicken: Perdue, animal welfare, and the failure of transparency CR Coker, RA Coker Communication Quarterly, 2022 | 4 | 2022 |
| (Re)productive Dissent: Reproductive Justice in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization CR Coker, A Faulstick Women's Studies in Communication 47 (1), 22-41, 2024 | 3 | 2024 |
| Late Night with Donald Trump: An Exploration of the Combined Effects of Political Comedy and Po liti cal Advertising FJ Jennings, CR Coker, JC Bramlett, JL Reed, JP Bolton An Unpre ce dented Election, 235, 2018 | 3 | 2018 |
Freddie J JenningsUniversity of ArkansasVerified email at uark.edu
