| The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries W Pearce, S Niederer, SM Özkula, N Sánchez Querubín Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 10 (2), e569, 2019 | 462 | 2019 |
| Growing polarization around climate change on social media M Falkenberg, A Galeazzi, M Torricelli, N Di Marco, F Larosa, M Sas, ... Nature Climate Change 12 (12), 1114-1121, 2022 | 454 | 2022 |
| An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research T Greenhalgh, E Annandale, R Ashcroft, J Barlow, N Black, A Bleakley, ... Bmj 352, 2016 | 454 | 2016 |
| Climate change on Twitter: Topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 report W Pearce, K Holmberg, I Hellsten, B Nerlich PloS one 9 (4), e94785, 2014 | 403 | 2014 |
| Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research social media images W Pearce, SM Özkula, AK Greene, L Teeling, JS Bansard, JJ Omena, ... Information, Communication & Society 23 (2), 161-180, 2020 | 365 | 2020 |
| Communicating climate change: Conduits, content, and consensus W Pearce, B Brown, B Nerlich, N Koteyko Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Climate change 6 (6), 613-626, 2015 | 260 | 2015 |
| The new randomised controlled trials (RCT) movement in public policy: challenges of epistemic governance W Pearce, S Raman Policy sciences 47 (4), 387-402, 2014 | 177 | 2014 |
| Evidence and policy: discourses, meanings and practices A Wesselink, H Colebatch, W Pearce Policy Sciences 47 (4), 339-344, 2014 | 150 | 2014 |
| Why setting a climate deadline is dangerous S Asayama, R Bellamy, O Geden, W Pearce, M Hulme Nature Climate Change 9 (8), 570-572, 2019 | 139 | 2019 |
| Beyond counting climate consensus W Pearce, R Grundmann, M Hulme, S Raman, E Hadley Kershaw, ... Environmental Communication: a journal of nature and culture, 2017 | 135 | 2017 |
| Three lessons from evidence-based medicine and policy: increase transparency, balance inputs and understand power K Oliver, W Pearce Palgrave Communications, 2017 | 106 | 2017 |
| Against the tide of depoliticisation: The politics of research governance S Hartley, W Pearce, A Taylor Policy & Politics 45 (3), 361-377, 2017 | 98 | 2017 |
| Science advice for global challenges: Learning from trade-offs in the IPCC W Pearce, M Mahony, S Raman Environmental Science & Policy 80, 125-131, 2018 | 97 | 2018 |
| NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing R Helliwell, S Hartley, W Pearce Agriculture and Human Values 36 (4), 779-791, 2019 | 72 | 2019 |
| What do we know about public attitudes towards experts? Reviewing survey data in the United Kingdom and European Union K Dommett, W Pearce Public Understanding of Science, 2019 | 70 | 2019 |
| Evidence and meaning in policy making W Pearce, A Wesselink, H Colebatch Evidence & Policy 10 (2), 161, 2014 | 70 | 2014 |
| Randomised trials in context: practical problems and social aspects of evidence-based medicine and policy W Pearce, S Raman, A Turner Trials 16 (1), 394, 2015 | 62 | 2015 |
| Tension between scientific certainty and meaning complicates communication of IPCC reports GJS Hollin, W Pearce Nature Climate Change 5 (8), 753-756, 2015 | 57 | 2015 |
| Trouble in the trough: how uncertainties were downplayed in the UK’s science advice on Covid-19 W Pearce Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7 (1), 2020 | 48 | 2020 |
| Why are NGOs sceptical of genome editing? R Helliwell, S Hartley, W Pearce, L O'Neill EMBO reports, e201744385, 2017 | 44* | 2017 |
Brigitte NerlichUniversity of NottinghamVerified email at nottingham.ac.uk
