[go: up one dir, main page]

Follow
Philippe Van de Calseyde
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Slow response times undermine trust in algorithmic (but not human) predictions
E Efendić, PPFM Van de Calseyde, AM Evans
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 157, 103-114, 2020
1312020
Extroversion and conscientiousness predict deteriorating job outcomes during the COVID-19 transition to enforced remote work
AM Evans, MC Meyers, P Van de Calseyde, O Stavrova
Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2021
1152021
Predictive maintenance for industry 5.0: behavioural inquiries from a work system perspective
B Van Oudenhoven, P Van de Calseyde, R Basten, E Demerouti
International Journal of Production Research 61 (22), 7846-7865, 2023
1042023
Decision time as information in judgment and choice
PPFM Van de Calseyde, G Keren, M Zeelenberg
Organizational behavior and human decision processes 125 (2), 113-122, 2014
972014
The effects of observed decision time on expectations of extremity and cooperation
AM Evans, PPFM Van De Calseyde
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 68, 50-59, 2017
842017
Leader decision speed as a signal of honesty
PPFM Van de Calseyde, AM Evans, E Demerouti
The Leadership Quarterly 32 (2), 2021
342021
The reputational consequences of generalized trust
AM Evans, PPFM Van de Calseyde
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44 (4), 492-507, 2018
342018
Does remote work erode trust in organizations? A within‐person investigation in the COVID‐19 context
O Stavrova, T Spiridonova, P van de Calseyde, C Meyers, AM Evans
Social and Personality Psychology Compass 17 (7), e12762, 2023
322023
The impact of doubt on the experience of regret
PPFM Van de Calseyde, M Zeelenberg, ERK Evers
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 149, 97-110, 2018
292018
PrimaVera: Synergising predictive maintenance
B Ton, R Basten, J Bolte, J Braaksma, A Di Bucchianico, ...
Applied Sciences 10 (23), 8348, 2020
202020
The insured victim effect: When and why compensating harm decreases punishment recommendations.
PPFM Van de Calseyde, G Keren, M Zeelenberg
Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2), 2013
202013
Taking a disagreeing perspective improves the accuracy of people’s quantitative estimates
PPFM Van de Calseyde, E Efendić
Psychological Science, 2022
182022
Taking algorithmic (vs. human) advice reveals different goals to others
E Efendić, PPFM Van de Calseyde, Š Bahník, MA Vranka
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-10, 2024
162024
The hidden cost of insurance on cooperation
PPFM Van de Calseyde, G Keren, M Zeelenberg
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2017
92017
Light-touch forecasting: A novel method to combine human judgment with statistical algorithms
B van der Staak, RJI Basten, P van de Calseyde, E Demerouti, AG de Kok
International Journal of Forecasting 41 (2), 440-451, 2025
52025
Preparing for predictive maintenance: Employee perspectives on job demands and resources before and after its implementation
B van Oudenhoven, E Demerouti, R Basten, P Van de Calseyde
Applied Ergonomics 129, 104561, 2025
22025
Disagreeing perspectives enhance inner-crowd wisdom for difficult (but not easy) questions
PPFM Van de Calseyde, E Efendić
Psychological Science, 2025
22025
Algorithm Speed
E Efendic, P van de Calseyde, A Evans
OSF, 2019
22019
Follow the fast: A simple algorithm for extracting wisdom from crowds
P Van de Calseyde, E Efendić, D van Dolder, M van den Assem, A Evans, ...
12025
Slow decision speed undermines trust in algorithmic (but not human) predictions
E Efendic, P van de Calseyde, A Evans
PrePrint, 2019
12019
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20