| Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers GE Gignac, ET Szodorai Personality and Individual Differences 102, 74-78, 2016 | 3470 | 2016 |
| The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science S Lewandowsky, GE Gignac, K Oberauer PloS one 8 (10), 2013 | 952 | 2013 |
| NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore,(Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science S Lewandowsky, K Oberauer, GE Gignac Psychological Science 24 (5), 622-633, 2013 | 903 | 2013 |
| The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science S Lewandowsky, GE Gignac, S Vaughan Nature Climate Change 3 (4), 399-404, 2013 | 643 | 2013 |
| A psychometric evaluation of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso emotional intelligence test version 2.0 BR Palmer, G Gignac, R Manocha, C Stough Intelligence 33 (3), 285-305, 2005 | 613 | 2005 |
| The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better GE Gignac Intelligence 55, 57-68, 2016 | 278 | 2016 |
| Bifactor Modeling and the Estimation of Model-Based Reliability in the WAIS-IV GE Gignac, MW Watkins Multivariate Behavioral Research 48 (5), 639-662, 2013 | 267 | 2013 |
| The Genos Emotional Intelligence Inventory: A measure designed specifically for workplace applications BR Palmer, C Stough, R Harmer, G Gignac Assessing emotional intelligence: Theory, research, and applications, 103-117, 2009 | 251 | 2009 |
| An examination of the factor structure of the Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence (SSREI) scale via confirmatory factor analysis GE Gignac, BR Palmer, R Manocha, C Stough Personality and Individual Differences 39 (6), 1029-1042, 2005 | 236 | 2005 |
| Higher-order models versus direct hierarchical models: g as superordinate or breadth factor? GE Gignac Psychology Science 50 (1), 21-43, 2008 | 224 | 2008 |
| Examining the factor structure of the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory with an Australian general population sample BR Palmer, R Manocha, G Gignac, C Stough Personality and Individual Differences 35 (5), 1191-1210, 2003 | 221 | 2003 |
| Science by Social Media: Attitudes Towards Climate Change are Mediated by Perceived Social Consensus S Lewandowsky, J Cook, N Fay, GE Gignac Memory & Cognition, 2019 | 199 | 2019 |
| The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data GE Gignac, M Zajenkowski Intelligence 80, 101449, 2020 | 195 | 2020 |
| Genos Emotional Intelligence Inventory GE Gignac Technical Manual (2nd Ed.), Sydney, Waterloo, NSW, 2010 | 194 | 2010 |
| Genos Emotional Intelligence Inventory GE Gignac Technical Manual (1st Ed.), Sydney, Waterloo, NSW: Genos, 2008 | 194 | 2008 |
| Raven's is not a pure measure of general intelligence: Implications for g factor theory and the brief measurement of g GE Gignac Intelligence 52, 71-79, 2015 | 177 | 2015 |
| Multi-factor modeling in individual differences research: Some recommendations and suggestions GE Gignac Personality and individual differences 42 (1), 37-48, 2007 | 153 | 2007 |
| The Comprehensive Autistic Trait Inventory (CATI): Development and validation of a new measure of autistic traits in the general population MCW English, GE Gignac, TAW Visser, AJO Whitehouse, JT Enns, ... Molecular Autism 12 (1), 1-23, 2021 | 152 | 2021 |
| Defining intelligence: Bridging the gap between human and artificial perspectives GE Gignac, ET Szodorai Intelligence 104, 101832, 2024 | 148 | 2024 |
| At what sample size do latent variable correlations stabilize? A Kretzschmar, GE Gignac Journal of Research in Personality 80, 17-22, 2019 | 148 | 2019 |
Con StoughAdjunct Professor, Swinburne University of TechnologyVerified email at swin.edu.au
