PEP 447 – Add __getdescriptor__ method to metaclass
- Author:
- Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren at mac.com>
- Status:
- Deferred
- Type:
- Standards Track
- Created:
- 12-Jun-2013
- Post-History:
- 02-Jul-2013, 15-Jul-2013, 29-Jul-2013, 22-Jul-2015
Abstract
Currently object.__getattribute__ and super.__getattribute__ peek
in the __dict__ of classes on the MRO for a class when looking for
an attribute. This PEP adds an optional __getdescriptor__ method to
a metaclass that replaces this behavior and gives more control over attribute
lookup, especially when using a super object.
That is, the MRO walking loop in _PyType_Lookup and
super.__getattribute__ gets changed from:
def lookup(mro_list, name):
    for cls in mro_list:
        if name in cls.__dict__:
            return cls.__dict__
    return NotFound
to:
def lookup(mro_list, name):
    for cls in mro_list:
        try:
            return cls.__getdescriptor__(name)
        except AttributeError:
            pass
    return NotFound
The default implementation of __getdescriptor__ looks in the class
dictionary:
class type:
   def __getdescriptor__(cls, name):
       try:
           return cls.__dict__[name]
       except KeyError:
           raise AttributeError(name) from None
PEP Status
This PEP is deferred until someone has time to update this PEP and push it forward.
Rationale
It is currently not possible to influence how the super class looks
up attributes (that is, super.__getattribute__ unconditionally
peeks in the class __dict__), and that can be problematic for
dynamic classes that can grow new methods on demand, for example dynamic
proxy classes.
The __getdescriptor__ method makes it possible to dynamically add
attributes even when looking them up using the super class.
The new method affects object.__getattribute__ (and
PyObject_GenericGetAttr) as well for consistency and to have a single
place to implement dynamic attribute resolution for classes.
Background
The current behavior of super.__getattribute__ causes problems for
classes that are dynamic proxies for other (non-Python) classes or types,
an example of which is PyObjC. PyObjC creates a Python class for every
class in the Objective-C runtime, and looks up methods in the Objective-C
runtime when they are used. This works fine for normal access, but doesn’t
work for access with super objects. Because of this PyObjC currently
includes a custom super that must be used with its classes, as well as
completely reimplementing PyObject_GenericGetAttr for normal attribute
access.
The API in this PEP makes it possible to remove the custom super and simplifies the implementation because the custom lookup behavior can be added in a central location.
Note
PyObjC cannot precalculate the contents of the class __dict__
because Objective-C classes can grow new methods at runtime. Furthermore,
Objective-C classes tend to contain a lot of methods while most Python
code will only use a small subset of them, this makes precalculating
unnecessarily expensive.
The superclass attribute lookup hook
Both super.__getattribute__ and object.__getattribute__ (or
PyObject_GenericGetAttr and in particular _PyType_Lookup in C code)
walk an object’s MRO and currently peek in the class’ __dict__ to look up
attributes.
With this proposal both lookup methods no longer peek in the class __dict__
but call the special method __getdescriptor__, which is a slot defined
on the metaclass. The default implementation of that method looks
up the name the class __dict__, which means that attribute lookup is
unchanged unless a metatype actually defines the new special method.
Aside: Attribute resolution algorithm in Python
The attribute resolution process as implemented by object.__getattribute__
(or PyObject_GenericGetAttr in CPython’s implementation) is fairly
straightforward, but not entirely so without reading C code.
The current CPython implementation of object.__getattribute__ is basically equivalent to the following (pseudo-) Python code (excluding some house keeping and speed tricks):
def _PyType_Lookup(tp, name):
    mro = tp.mro()
    assert isinstance(mro, tuple)
    for base in mro:
       assert isinstance(base, type)
       # PEP 447 will change these lines:
       try:
           return base.__dict__[name]
       except KeyError:
           pass
    return None
class object:
    def __getattribute__(self, name):
        assert isinstance(name, str)
        tp = type(self)
        descr = _PyType_Lookup(tp, name)
        f = None
        if descr is not None:
            f = descr.__get__
            if f is not None and descr.__set__ is not None:
                # Data descriptor
                return f(descr, self, type(self))
        dict = self.__dict__
        if dict is not None:
            try:
                return self.__dict__[name]
            except KeyError:
                pass
        if f is not None:
            # Non-data descriptor
            return f(descr, self, type(self))
        if descr is not None:
            # Regular class attribute
            return descr
        raise AttributeError(name)
class super:
    def __getattribute__(self, name):
       assert isinstance(name, unicode)
       if name != '__class__':
           starttype = self.__self_type__
           mro = startype.mro()
           try:
               idx = mro.index(self.__thisclass__)
           except ValueError:
               pass
           else:
               for base in mro[idx+1:]:
                   # PEP 447 will change these lines:
                   try:
                       descr = base.__dict__[name]
                   except KeyError:
                       continue
                   f = descr.__get__
                   if f is not None:
                       return f(descr,
                           None if (self.__self__ is self.__self_type__) else self.__self__,
                           starttype)
                   else:
                       return descr
       return object.__getattribute__(self, name)
This PEP should change the dict lookup at the lines starting at “# PEP 447” with a method call to perform the actual lookup, making is possible to affect that lookup both for normal attribute access and access through the super proxy.
Note that specific classes can already completely override the default
behaviour by implementing their own __getattribute__ slot (with or without
calling the super class implementation).
In Python code
A meta type can define a method __getdescriptor__ that is called during
attribute resolution by both super.__getattribute__
and object.__getattribute:
class MetaType(type):
    def __getdescriptor__(cls, name):
        try:
            return cls.__dict__[name]
        except KeyError:
            raise AttributeError(name) from None
The __getdescriptor__ method has as its arguments a class (which is an
instance of the meta type) and the name of the attribute that is looked up.
It should return the value of the attribute without invoking descriptors,
and should raise AttributeError when the name cannot be found.
The type class provides a default implementation for __getdescriptor__,
that looks up the name in the class dictionary.
Example usage
The code below implements a silly metaclass that redirects attribute lookup to uppercase versions of names:
class UpperCaseAccess (type):
    def __getdescriptor__(cls, name):
        try:
            return cls.__dict__[name.upper()]
        except KeyError:
            raise AttributeError(name) from None
class SillyObject (metaclass=UpperCaseAccess):
    def m(self):
        return 42
    def M(self):
        return "fortytwo"
obj = SillyObject()
assert obj.m() == "fortytwo"
As mentioned earlier in this PEP a more realistic use case of this
functionality is a __getdescriptor__ method that dynamically populates the
class __dict__ based on attribute access, primarily when it is not
possible to reliably keep the class dict in sync with its source, for example
because the source used to populate __dict__ is dynamic as well and does
not have triggers that can be used to detect changes to that source.
An example of that are the class bridges in PyObjC: the class bridge is a Python object (class) that represents an Objective-C class and conceptually has a Python method for every Objective-C method in the Objective-C class. As with Python it is possible to add new methods to an Objective-C class, or replace existing ones, and there are no callbacks that can be used to detect this.
In C code
A new type flag Py_TPFLAGS_GETDESCRIPTOR with value (1UL << 11) that
indicates that the new slot is present and to be used.
A new slot tp_getdescriptor is added to the PyTypeObject struct, this
slot corresponds to the __getdescriptor__ method on type.
The slot has the following prototype:
PyObject* (*getdescriptorfunc)(PyTypeObject* cls, PyObject* name);
This method should lookup name in the namespace of cls, without looking at
superclasses, and should not invoke descriptors. The method returns NULL
without setting an exception when the name cannot be found, and returns a
new reference otherwise (not a borrowed reference).
Classes with a tp_getdescriptor slot must add Py_TPFLAGS_GETDESCRIPTOR
to tp_flags to indicate that new slot must be used.
Use of this hook by the interpreter
The new method is required for metatypes and as such is defined on type_.
Both super.__getattribute__ and
object.__getattribute__/PyObject_GenericGetAttr
(through _PyType_Lookup) use the this __getdescriptor__ method when
walking the MRO.
Other changes to the implementation
The change for PyObject_GenericGetAttr will be done by changing the private
function _PyType_Lookup. This currently returns a borrowed reference, but
must return a new reference when the __getdescriptor__ method is present.
Because of this _PyType_Lookup will be renamed to _PyType_LookupName,
this will cause compile-time errors for all out-of-tree users of this
private API.
For the same reason _PyType_LookupId is renamed to _PyType_LookupId2.
A number of other functions in typeobject.c with the same issue do not get
an updated name because they are private to that file.
The attribute lookup cache in Objects/typeobject.c is disabled for classes
that have a metaclass that overrides __getdescriptor__, because using the
cache might not be valid for such classes.
Impact of this PEP on introspection
Use of the method introduced in this PEP can affect introspection of classes
with a metaclass that uses a custom __getdescriptor__ method. This section
lists those changes.
The items listed below are only affected by custom __getdescriptor__
methods, the default implementation for object won’t cause problems
because that still only uses the class __dict__ and won’t cause visible
changes to the visible behaviour of the object.__getattribute__.
- dirmight not show all attributes- As with a custom - __getattribute__method dir() might not see all (instance) attributes when using the- __getdescriptor__()method to dynamically resolve attributes.- The solution for that is quite simple: classes using - __getdescriptor__should also implement __dir__() if they want full support for the builtin dir() function.
- inspect.getattr_staticmight not show all attributes- The function - inspect.getattr_staticintentionally does not invoke- __getattribute__and descriptors to avoid invoking user code during introspection with this function. The- __getdescriptor__method will also be ignored and is another way in which the result of- inspect.getattr_staticcan be different from that of- builtin.getattr.
- inspect.getmembersand- inspect.classify_class_attrs- Both of these functions directly access the class __dict__ of classes along the MRO, and hence can be affected by a custom - __getdescriptor__method.- Code with a custom - __getdescriptor__method that want to play nice with these methods also needs to ensure that the- __dict__is set up correctly when that is accessed directly by Python code.- Note that - inspect.getmembersis used by- pydocand hence this can affect runtime documentation introspection.
- Direct introspection of the class __dict__Any code that directly access the class __dict__for introspection can be affected by a custom__getdescriptor__method, see the previous item.
Performance impact
WARNING: The benchmark results in this section are old, and will be updated when I’ve ported the patch to the current trunk. I don’t expect significant changes to the results in this section.
Micro benchmarks
Issue 18181 has a micro benchmark as one of its attachments (pep447-micro-bench.py) that specifically tests the speed of attribute lookup, both directly and through super.
Note that attribute lookup with deep class hierarchies is significantly slower
when using a custom __getdescriptor__ method. This is because the
attribute lookup cache for CPython cannot be used when having this method.
Pybench
The pybench output below compares an implementation of this PEP with the regular source tree, both based on changeset a5681f50bae2, run on an idle machine and Core i7 processor running Centos 6.4.
Even though the machine was idle there were clear differences between runs, I’ve seen difference in “minimum time” vary from -0.1% to +1.5%, with similar (but slightly smaller) differences in the “average time” difference.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PYBENCH 2.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* using CPython 3.4.0a0 (default, Jul 29 2013, 13:01:34) [GCC 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)]
* disabled garbage collection
* system check interval set to maximum: 2147483647
* using timer: time.perf_counter
* timer: resolution=1e-09, implementation=clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark: pep447.pybench
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Rounds: 10
    Warp:   10
    Timer:  time.perf_counter
    Machine Details:
       Platform ID:    Linux-2.6.32-358.114.1.openstack.el6.x86_64-x86_64-with-centos-6.4-Final
       Processor:      x86_64
    Python:
       Implementation: CPython
       Executable:     /tmp/default-pep447/bin/python3
       Version:        3.4.0a0
       Compiler:       GCC 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)
       Bits:           64bit
       Build:          Jul 29 2013 14:09:12 (#default)
       Unicode:        UCS4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing with: default.pybench
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Rounds: 10
    Warp:   10
    Timer:  time.perf_counter
    Machine Details:
       Platform ID:    Linux-2.6.32-358.114.1.openstack.el6.x86_64-x86_64-with-centos-6.4-Final
       Processor:      x86_64
    Python:
       Implementation: CPython
       Executable:     /tmp/default/bin/python3
       Version:        3.4.0a0
       Compiler:       GCC 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)
       Bits:           64bit
       Build:          Jul 29 2013 13:01:34 (#default)
       Unicode:        UCS4
Test                             minimum run-time        average  run-time
                                 this    other   diff    this    other   diff
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          BuiltinFunctionCalls:    45ms    44ms   +1.3%    45ms    44ms   +1.3%
           BuiltinMethodLookup:    26ms    27ms   -2.4%    27ms    27ms   -2.2%
                 CompareFloats:    33ms    34ms   -0.7%    33ms    34ms   -1.1%
         CompareFloatsIntegers:    66ms    67ms   -0.9%    66ms    67ms   -0.8%
               CompareIntegers:    51ms    50ms   +0.9%    51ms    50ms   +0.8%
        CompareInternedStrings:    34ms    33ms   +0.4%    34ms    34ms   -0.4%
                  CompareLongs:    29ms    29ms   -0.1%    29ms    29ms   -0.0%
                CompareStrings:    43ms    44ms   -1.8%    44ms    44ms   -1.8%
    ComplexPythonFunctionCalls:    44ms    42ms   +3.9%    44ms    42ms   +4.1%
                 ConcatStrings:    33ms    33ms   -0.4%    33ms    33ms   -1.0%
               CreateInstances:    47ms    48ms   -2.9%    47ms    49ms   -3.4%
            CreateNewInstances:    35ms    36ms   -2.5%    36ms    36ms   -2.5%
       CreateStringsWithConcat:    69ms    70ms   -0.7%    69ms    70ms   -0.9%
                  DictCreation:    52ms    50ms   +3.1%    52ms    50ms   +3.0%
             DictWithFloatKeys:    40ms    44ms  -10.1%    43ms    45ms   -5.8%
           DictWithIntegerKeys:    32ms    36ms  -11.2%    35ms    37ms   -4.6%
            DictWithStringKeys:    29ms    34ms  -15.7%    35ms    40ms  -11.0%
                      ForLoops:    30ms    29ms   +2.2%    30ms    29ms   +2.2%
                    IfThenElse:    38ms    41ms   -6.7%    38ms    41ms   -6.9%
                   ListSlicing:    36ms    36ms   -0.7%    36ms    37ms   -1.3%
                NestedForLoops:    43ms    45ms   -3.1%    43ms    45ms   -3.2%
      NestedListComprehensions:    39ms    40ms   -1.7%    39ms    40ms   -2.1%
          NormalClassAttribute:    86ms    82ms   +5.1%    86ms    82ms   +5.0%
       NormalInstanceAttribute:    42ms    42ms   +0.3%    42ms    42ms   +0.0%
           PythonFunctionCalls:    39ms    38ms   +3.5%    39ms    38ms   +2.8%
             PythonMethodCalls:    51ms    49ms   +3.0%    51ms    50ms   +2.8%
                     Recursion:    67ms    68ms   -1.4%    67ms    68ms   -1.4%
                  SecondImport:    41ms    36ms  +12.5%    41ms    36ms  +12.6%
           SecondPackageImport:    45ms    40ms  +13.1%    45ms    40ms  +13.2%
         SecondSubmoduleImport:    92ms    95ms   -2.4%    95ms    98ms   -3.6%
       SimpleComplexArithmetic:    28ms    28ms   -0.1%    28ms    28ms   -0.2%
        SimpleDictManipulation:    57ms    57ms   -1.0%    57ms    58ms   -1.0%
         SimpleFloatArithmetic:    29ms    28ms   +4.7%    29ms    28ms   +4.9%
      SimpleIntFloatArithmetic:    37ms    41ms   -8.5%    37ms    41ms   -8.7%
       SimpleIntegerArithmetic:    37ms    41ms   -9.4%    37ms    42ms  -10.2%
      SimpleListComprehensions:    33ms    33ms   -1.9%    33ms    34ms   -2.9%
        SimpleListManipulation:    28ms    30ms   -4.3%    29ms    30ms   -4.1%
          SimpleLongArithmetic:    26ms    26ms   +0.5%    26ms    26ms   +0.5%
                    SmallLists:    40ms    40ms   +0.1%    40ms    40ms   +0.1%
                   SmallTuples:    46ms    47ms   -2.4%    46ms    48ms   -3.0%
         SpecialClassAttribute:   126ms   120ms   +4.7%   126ms   121ms   +4.4%
      SpecialInstanceAttribute:    42ms    42ms   +0.6%    42ms    42ms   +0.8%
                StringMappings:    94ms    91ms   +3.9%    94ms    91ms   +3.8%
              StringPredicates:    48ms    49ms   -1.7%    48ms    49ms   -2.1%
                 StringSlicing:    45ms    45ms   +1.4%    46ms    45ms   +1.5%
                     TryExcept:    23ms    22ms   +4.9%    23ms    22ms   +4.8%
                    TryFinally:    32ms    32ms   -0.1%    32ms    32ms   +0.1%
                TryRaiseExcept:    17ms    17ms   +0.9%    17ms    17ms   +0.5%
                  TupleSlicing:    49ms    48ms   +1.1%    49ms    49ms   +1.0%
                   WithFinally:    48ms    47ms   +2.3%    48ms    47ms   +2.4%
               WithRaiseExcept:    45ms    44ms   +0.8%    45ms    45ms   +0.5%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals:                          2284ms  2287ms   -0.1%  2306ms  2308ms   -0.1%
(this=pep447.pybench, other=default.pybench)
A run of the benchmark suite (with option “-b 2n3”) also seems to indicate that the performance impact is minimal:
Report on Linux fangorn.local 2.6.32-358.114.1.openstack.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jul 3 02:11:25 EDT 2013 x86_64 x86_64
Total CPU cores: 8
### call_method_slots ###
Min: 0.304120 -> 0.282791: 1.08x faster
Avg: 0.304394 -> 0.282906: 1.08x faster
Significant (t=2329.92)
Stddev: 0.00016 -> 0.00004: 4.1814x smaller
### call_simple ###
Min: 0.249268 -> 0.221175: 1.13x faster
Avg: 0.249789 -> 0.221387: 1.13x faster
Significant (t=2770.11)
Stddev: 0.00012 -> 0.00013: 1.1101x larger
### django_v2 ###
Min: 0.632590 -> 0.601519: 1.05x faster
Avg: 0.635085 -> 0.602653: 1.05x faster
Significant (t=321.32)
Stddev: 0.00087 -> 0.00051: 1.6933x smaller
### fannkuch ###
Min: 1.033181 -> 0.999779: 1.03x faster
Avg: 1.036457 -> 1.001840: 1.03x faster
Significant (t=260.31)
Stddev: 0.00113 -> 0.00070: 1.6112x smaller
### go ###
Min: 0.526714 -> 0.544428: 1.03x slower
Avg: 0.529649 -> 0.547626: 1.03x slower
Significant (t=-93.32)
Stddev: 0.00136 -> 0.00136: 1.0028x smaller
### iterative_count ###
Min: 0.109748 -> 0.116513: 1.06x slower
Avg: 0.109816 -> 0.117202: 1.07x slower
Significant (t=-357.08)
Stddev: 0.00008 -> 0.00019: 2.3664x larger
### json_dump_v2 ###
Min: 2.554462 -> 2.609141: 1.02x slower
Avg: 2.564472 -> 2.620013: 1.02x slower
Significant (t=-76.93)
Stddev: 0.00538 -> 0.00481: 1.1194x smaller
### meteor_contest ###
Min: 0.196336 -> 0.191925: 1.02x faster
Avg: 0.196878 -> 0.192698: 1.02x faster
Significant (t=61.86)
Stddev: 0.00053 -> 0.00041: 1.2925x smaller
### nbody ###
Min: 0.228039 -> 0.235551: 1.03x slower
Avg: 0.228857 -> 0.236052: 1.03x slower
Significant (t=-54.15)
Stddev: 0.00130 -> 0.00029: 4.4810x smaller
### pathlib ###
Min: 0.108501 -> 0.105339: 1.03x faster
Avg: 0.109084 -> 0.105619: 1.03x faster
Significant (t=311.08)
Stddev: 0.00022 -> 0.00011: 1.9314x smaller
### regex_effbot ###
Min: 0.057905 -> 0.056447: 1.03x faster
Avg: 0.058055 -> 0.056760: 1.02x faster
Significant (t=79.22)
Stddev: 0.00006 -> 0.00015: 2.7741x larger
### silent_logging ###
Min: 0.070810 -> 0.072436: 1.02x slower
Avg: 0.070899 -> 0.072609: 1.02x slower
Significant (t=-191.59)
Stddev: 0.00004 -> 0.00008: 2.2640x larger
### spectral_norm ###
Min: 0.290255 -> 0.299286: 1.03x slower
Avg: 0.290335 -> 0.299541: 1.03x slower
Significant (t=-572.10)
Stddev: 0.00005 -> 0.00015: 2.8547x larger
### threaded_count ###
Min: 0.107215 -> 0.115206: 1.07x slower
Avg: 0.107488 -> 0.115996: 1.08x slower
Significant (t=-109.39)
Stddev: 0.00016 -> 0.00076: 4.8665x larger
The following not significant results are hidden, use -v to show them:
call_method, call_method_unknown, chaos, fastpickle, fastunpickle, float, formatted_logging, hexiom2, json_load, normal_startup, nqueens, pidigits, raytrace, regex_compile, regex_v8, richards, simple_logging, startup_nosite, telco, unpack_sequence.
Alternative proposals
__getattribute_super__
An earlier version of this PEP used the following static method on classes:
def __getattribute_super__(cls, name, object, owner): pass
This method performed name lookup as well as invoking descriptors and was
necessarily limited to working only with super.__getattribute__.
Reuse tp_getattro
It would be nice to avoid adding a new slot, thus keeping the API simpler and
easier to understand.  A comment on Issue 18181 asked about reusing the
tp_getattro slot, that is super could call the tp_getattro slot of all
methods along the MRO.
That won’t work because tp_getattro will look in the instance
__dict__ before it tries to resolve attributes using classes in the MRO.
This would mean that using tp_getattro instead of peeking the class
dictionaries changes the semantics of the super class.
Alternative placement of the new method
This PEP proposes to add __getdescriptor__ as a method on the metaclass.
An alternative would be to add it as a class method on the class itself
(similar to how __new__ is a staticmethod of the class and not a method
of the metaclass).
The advantage of using a method on the metaclass is that will give an error
when two classes on the MRO have different metaclasses that may have different
behaviors for __getdescriptor__. With a normal classmethod that problem
would pass undetected while it might cause subtle errors when running the code.
History
- 23-Jul-2015: Added type flag Py_TPFLAGS_GETDESCRIPTORafter talking with Guido.The new flag is primarily useful to avoid crashing when loading an extension for an older version of CPython and could have positive speed implications as well. 
- Jul-2014: renamed slot to __getdescriptor__, the old name didn’t match the naming style of other slots and was less descriptive.
Discussion threads
- The initial version of the PEP was send with Message-ID mailto:75030FAC-6918-4E94-95DA-67A88D53E6F5@mac.com
- Further discussion starting at a message with Message-ID mailto:5BB87CC4-F31B-4213-AAAC-0C0CE738460C@mac.com
- And more discussion starting at message with Message-ID mailto:00AA7433-C853-4101-9718-060468EBAC54@mac.com
References
- Issue 18181 contains an out of date prototype implementation
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0447.rst
Last modified: 2025-02-01 08:55:40 GMT