[go: up one dir, main page]

|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Addressing Meltdown and Spectre in the kernel

Addressing Meltdown and Spectre in the kernel

Posted Jan 8, 2018 16:51 UTC (Mon) by dw (guest, #12017)
In reply to: Addressing Meltdown and Spectre in the kernel by dskoll
Parent article: Addressing Meltdown and Spectre in the kernel

Speaking as the mostly clueless, would there be any sense in halting speculation if it leads to a load that was not present in L1? In that case, at least latency of L2/L3 will always be involved, if not a bus transaction. This would seem to be efficient where it matters, e.g. tight loops where the instruction stream is already cached, and for other cases PREFETCHxx could be used to explicitly request population where it was known it could not create problems


The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:

Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds