- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:43:52 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:12 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 09/19/2011 03:58 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>
>> Summary
>> -------
>> HTML is defining<style scoped> in a way which best matches author
>> intuitions, but which is limited in some ways. I propose @global as a
>> way to get around those limitations while maintaining the
>> intuitiveness benefits. Hixie wrote an email explaining the relevant
>> reasoning and suggesting this proposal at
>>
>> <http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-September/033222.html>.
>
> What's the use case for this, i.e. do we actually need to solve this
> problem?
A concrete use-case is provided at the very top of Hixie's email:
<body class="archive">
...
<section>
<style scoped>
section > h1 { border-bottom: solid; }
body.homepage h1 { color: red; }
body.archive h1 { color: gray; }
</style>
<h1>Hello</h1> <!-- this changes colour based on whether it's on a
page with <body class=homepage> or <body
class=archive> -->
<p>Welcome.</p>
</section>
...
</body>
Here, you want to style just the given section, without styles leaking
out into the rest of the document, thus you use <style scoped>.
However, you want to change the styling of the <h1> based on context
outside of the scope, in this case the class of the <body>. (Implicit
in this example is the fact that the same section will be generated on
multiple pages.)
~TJ
Received on Monday, 19 September 2011 23:44:48 UTC