- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:50:51 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
L. David Baron wrote:
> I think Boris's point is that the definition has to be written such
> that the value of CSS properties has no influence on whether
> selectors match. At least I hope that was his point.
Indeed, it was.
> (The definition of which elements should match :disabled could
> perhaps be left to the underlying markup language. However,
> Lachlan's definition clearly allows too many factors to influence
> that matching.)
Right.
> Whether an element is display:none absolutely cannot change whether
> it matches disabled; otherwise we'd have big problems with
> :disabled { display: inline ! important; }
Yes, exactly.
-Boris
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 04:51:50 UTC