[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Comparison of Probabilistic Unfolding Theories for Paired Comparisons Data

  • Book
  • © 1990

Overview

Part of the book series: Recent Research in Psychology (PSYCHOLOGY)

  • 417 Accesses

  • 29 Citations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

Softcover Book EUR 105.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

About this book

Some data-analytic methods excel by their sheer elegance. Their basic principles seem to have a particular attraction, based on a intricate combination of simplicity, deliberation, and power. They usually balance on the verge of two disciplines, data-analysis and foundational measurement, or statistics and psychology. To me, unfolding has always been one of them. The theory and the original methodology were created by Clyde Coombs (1912-1988) to describe and analyze preferential choice data. The fundamental assumptions are truly psy­ chological; Unfolding is based on the notion of a single peaked preference function over a psychological similarity space, or, in an alternative but equivalent expression, on the assumption of implicit comparisons with an ideal alternative. Unfolding has proved to be a very constructive data-analytic principle, and a source of inspiration for many theories on choice behavior. Yet the number of applications has not lived up to the acclaim the theory has received among mathematical psychologists. One of the reasons is that it requires far more consistency in human choice behavior than can be expected. Several authors have tried to attenuate these requirements by turning the deterministic unfolding theory into a probabilistic one. Since Coombs first put forth a probabilistic version of his theory, a number of competing proposals have been presented in the literature over the past thirty years. This monograph contains a summary and a comparison of unfolding theories for paired comparisons data, and an evaluation strategy designed to assess the validity of these theories in empirical choice tasks.

Similar content being viewed by others

Table of contents (5 chapters)

Authors and Affiliations

  • Center for Clinical Decision Making, Medical Faculty, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Patrick Bossuyt

Accessibility Information

PDF accessibility summary

This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.

EPUB accessibility summary

This ePub was produced prior to the implementation of current accessibility best practices. If Math is present, it is represented either as MathML, LaTeX or in images. Text alternatives are not available for images, graphs and other non-text content. We recognize the importance of accessibility, and we welcome queries about accessibility for any of our products. If you have a question or an access need, please get in touch with us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com.

Bibliographic Information

Keywords

Publish with us