Overview
- Tells how to conceive of and account for the various kinds of uncertainty encountered in the process of evidential proof
- Uses psychology to explore how humans settle on truth and uses logic to establish how humans should settle on truth
- Deconstructs legal factfinding as the prime example, but applies the analysis to all decisionmaking under uncertainty
Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library (LAPS, volume 148)
Access this book
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
About this book
This book reframes the fundamentals of decisionmaking under uncertainty. For almost a century, theorists have spoken of truth-finding in terms of probability. They have said things like some past fact was 51% certain or proclaimed that in a civil dispute a fact must be shown to exceed a 50% likelihood. But such talk is a misleading misconception. The reason is that traditional probability fails to distinguish epistemic uncertainty from aleatory uncertainty. This conflation leads to mistakes such as invoking probability’s product rules, which calculate a conjunction’s likelihood as being low. From there, the theorists have argued that in a myriad of ways, the law violates the probability calculus unforgivably.
Today, other theorists are newly realizing that in large part the law does not deal in probability. They now can defend the way that law has found facts since long before the invention of probability and on to the present. They are also reevaluating such intuitive practices as those that humans use in daily life to combine inferences upon inferences. A hotly contested literature has emerged.
In a significant, comprehensive, and original contribution, this book develops a theoretical justification for the intuitive approaches that humans deploy across a broad range of decisionmaking. Instead of probability, the book focuses on degrees of belief that estimate, given the state of the evidence, how far a proposition has been fully proven. Instead of combining findings by the rules of probability, the book uses the rules of multivalent logic. The aim is to illuminate decisionmaking outside statistical analysis, showing that our ancient wisdom is in fact theoretically solid. The target is everyone interested in improving decisionmaking.
Similar content being viewed by others
Table of contents (7 chapters)
Authors and Affiliations
About the author
Prof. Kevin M. Clermont is the Ziff Professor of Law at Cornell Law School. A graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Law School, he also attended law school in France as a Fulbright Scholar. Next there was a judicial clerkship and practice on Wall Street, before entry into teaching at Cornell University. He was awarded the French Legion of Honor in 2008. His field is civil procedure, with a specialty in the theory of proof. Professor Clermont has published extensively, including coauthoring books both on introduction to law and on civil procedure, Law for Society: Nature, Functions, and Limits (2010) and Materials for a Basic Course in Civil Procedure (14th ed. 2023), as well as sole authoring and editing many other books on civil procedure. On proof, he has written the book Standards of Decision in Law: Psychological and Logical Bases for the Standard of Proof, Here and Abroad (2013) and nineteen journal articles over a period of thirty years.
Accessibility Information
PDF accessibility summary
This PDF does not fully comply with PDF/UA standards, but does feature limited screen reader support, described non-text content (images, graphs), bookmarks for easy navigation and searchable, selectable text. Users of assistive technologies may experience difficulty navigating or interpreting content in this document. We recognize the importance of accessibility, and we welcome queries about accessibility for any of our products. If you have a question or an access need, please get in touch with us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com.
EPUB accessibility summary
This ebook is designed with accessibility in mind, aiming to meet the ePub Accessibility 1.0 AA and WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards. Its features include described images and other non-text content, screenreader-friendly navigation and accessible math. Math is represented either as MathML, LaTeX or in images. If math is represented as image, Alt Text might not be present. We recognize the importance of accessibility, and we welcome queries about accessibility for any of our products. If you have a question or an access need, please get in touch with us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com.
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: A General Theory of Evidence and Proof
Book Subtitle: Forming Beliefs in Truth
Authors: Kevin M. Clermont
Series Title: Law and Philosophy Library
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66552-3
Publisher: Springer Cham
eBook Packages: Law and Criminology, Law and Criminology (R0)
Copyright Information: The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-031-66551-6Published: 03 October 2024
Softcover ISBN: 978-3-031-66554-7Published: 04 October 2025
eBook ISBN: 978-3-031-66552-3Published: 02 October 2024
Series ISSN: 1572-4395
Series E-ISSN: 2215-0315
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: VII, 234
Number of Illustrations: 11 b/w illustrations, 8 illustrations in colour