8000 some omevalidation checks are too strict or misapplied · Issue #121 · nf-core/mcmicro · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

some omevalidation checks are too strict or misapplied #121

Open

Description

@jmuhlich

Description of the bug

Checks to be weakened:

  • ExposureTime doesn't need to be the same for all channels
  • SizeX and SizeY don't need to be the same as each other

A lot of these checks should actually be performed across samples, e.g. for all samples, cycle 1 channel 1 ExposureTime is the same value.

Optional enhancement: De-duplicate repeated values to avoid blowing out the column width. E.g. instead of:

SizeC	[4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4]

Maybe it would read something like:

SizeC	4 (x 30)

Same idea for the PhysicalSize and Type rows.

Command used and terminal output

Relevant files

No response

System information

No response

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      0