Repository navigation
[Principia M2] Review the Definitions, Laws, and Book I source map #20
Description
Parent: #17
Blocked by: #18, #19
Objective
Create the first complete, reviewed source map for the campaign using canonical source-object packets rather than an OCR dump or informal notes.
Pilot scope
Map the complete:
- Definitions section;
- Laws of Motion section, including associated corollaries and scholia;
- first three sections of Book I, identified by the edition as the minimum mathematical preparation before Book III.
Required classification
Every source object must receive:
- a structured edition/book/section/item/page locator;
- a source-segment hash produced by the committed normalization rule;
- a textual layer distinguishing work text, translation/editorial material, biography, publisher matter, or uncertainty;
- a source role such as definition, law/postulate, philosophical rule, pure mathematical lemma, mathematical proposition, corollary, problem/construction, physical-model claim, phenomenon, empirical measurement, approximation, scholium, diagram, or historical/editorial material;
- attributed author/translator/editor roles;
- extraction method;
- editorial review state;
- rights review state;
- fidelity notes where wording or attribution is ambiguous.
Mapping requirements
For each selected source object, create zero or more reviewed links to:
- an edition-faithful restatement;
- a modern specialization or generalization;
- a formalization target;
- an analytical core;
- an approximation justification;
- an empirical premise;
- historical context.
Every mapping must describe assumptions added, removed, strengthened, weakened, specialized, or generalized. The mapping review state must not change the proof authority of either endpoint.
Review workflow
- deterministic extraction/localization;
- human locator review;
- source-fidelity review;
- separate mathematical interpretation review;
- rights/excerpt review;
- external review where available.
Generated outputs
- source-object packets for the full pilot scope;
- reverse relation index;
- coverage report grouped by source section and source role;
- unresolved-fidelity report;
- unresolved-rights report;
- explicit list of excluded editorial/biographical matter.
Acceptance criteria
- 100% of pilot objects have locators, roles, segment hashes, textual layers, review states, and rights states.
- No English translation is described as exact original Latin wording.
- Translator/editor/biographer material is not attributed to Newton.
- No retrieved passage or model extraction becomes canonical without source-object review.
- No whole-book OCR dump is committed as packet content.
- Coverage can be regenerated from packet data without a hand-maintained second database.
Activity