LLM systems from prototype to production
After the production readiness review, or after a pilot I built, I implement the agreed production changes in your repository.
Independent AI consultant · Brescia
I check what it still needs before daily use, and can then build the fixes in your repository.
Only have a supplier's AI quote? I read it and tell you in writing whether to go ahead, fix it first, or stop.
For technical teams: I check an AI prototype that works in a demo and take it to daily use. For business owners and managers: before you sign a supplier's AI quote, I give you a written second opinion. No quote yet, only a process where you'd like to use AI? A process diagnosis tells you in writing whether it makes sense and what the first step is.
I decide what the AI may do on its own and what a person must check, so errors and costs don't come as a surprise.
Already have an AI project or quote? Get a written second opinion
After the production readiness review, or after a pilot I built, I implement the agreed production changes in your repository.
I can work as a part-time Fractional CTO as a standalone engagement, with or without an LLM prototype: architecture, code and vendor reviews, and a delivery roadmap.
I document how to run and maintain an existing codebase, with tests, operating procedures, and access I am authorized to transfer. Handover can be a standalone engagement.
I describe the problem and what I built, with links to the code and supporting evidence.
#openfatture
My own project, open source
Italian e-invoices must be built in the FatturaPA format and sent through SDI, the national exchange system. Usually a subscription service does this and also keeps your clients and archive.
My own open-source project: it prepares the e-invoice and checks its format before it goes to SDI. The data stays on your machine.
For readers who want the technical detail: two projects with public code and documentation.
#emotional-memory
My own project, open source
I encode affective state into a memory store and run a published benchmark; the claim matrix feeds back into encoding. Dataset ingest and the published artifacts stay on the project page — this preview omits them.
Can affective state recorded at encoding time improve recall for agents that talk to the same person across sessions? And where does it stop helping?
On a published benchmark (Zenodo DOI) built to test emotion labels supplied at storage time, the method beat a standard cosine baseline on LLM-judged answer accuracy. Negative results outside that regime are in the repo: I treat this as evidence for that case, not a universal claim.
#orka
My own project, open source
Channel input is routed into a scheduler that runs a bounded workflow and writes a checkpoint. An interrupted run resumes from that checkpoint. Protocol adapters stay on the project page — this preview omits them.
Requests arrive from Telegram, Discord, Slack, WhatsApp, and HTTP, but without a single durable queue there is no reliable path from channel input to a tracked, reviewable LLM workflow.
It takes requests from several channels into one prioritized queue and, if it stops, resumes from the last saved step. Pre-release, no SLA. (MCP/A2A support: detail on the project page.)
Write to info@gianlucamazza.it with the operational problem and the systems involved. I reply with the next step. Email first; a 20-minute call if useful.
System design notes explain architecture patterns. The architecture of this site shows how model proposals pass checks before publication.